The ARQUIGRAFIA project:A Web Collaborative Environment for Architecture and Urban Heritage Image

doi:10.2478/jdis-2020-0005

Journal of Data and Information Science ›› 2020, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 51-67.doi: 10.2478/jdis-2020-0005

收稿日期:2020-01-17 修回日期:2020-03-02 接受日期:2020-03-10 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2012-06-22

The ARQUIGRAFIA project:A Web Collaborative Environment for Architecture and Urban Heritage Image

Vânia Mara Alves Lima^1,^†(), Cibele Araújo Camargo Marques dos Santos¹, Artur Simões Rozestraten²

¹Department of Information and Culture, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
²Department of Architecture Technology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Received:2020-01-17 Revised:2020-03-02 Accepted:2020-03-10 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2012-06-22
Contact: Vânia Mara Alves Lima E-mail:vamal@usp.br

摘要/Abstract

Abstract:

Purpose: This paper presents the ARQUIGRAFIA project, an open, public and nonprofit, continuous growth web collaborative environment dedicated to Brazilian architectural photographic images.

Design/methodology/approach: The ARQUIGRAFIA project promotes the active and collaborative participation among its institutional users (GLAMs, NGOs, laboratories and research groups) and private users (students, professionals, professors, researchers), both can create an account and share their digitized iconographic collections in the same Web environment by uploading their files, indexing, georeferencing and assigning a Creative Commons license.

Findings: The development of users interactions by means of semantic differentials impressions recording on visible plastic-spatial aspects of the architectures in synthetic infographics, as well as by the retrieval of images through an advanced system search based on those impressions parameters. By gamification means, the system often invites users to review images’ in order to improve images’ data accuracy. The pilot project named Open Air Museum that allows users to add audio descriptions to images in situ. An interface for users’ digital curatorship will be soon available.

Research limitations: The ARQUIGRAFIA’s multidisciplinary team gathering professors-researchers, graduate and undergraduate students from the Architecture and Urbanism, Design, Information Science, Computer Science faculties of the University of São Paulo, demands continuous financial resources for grants, for contracting third party services, for the participation in scientific events in Brazil and abroad, and for equipment. Since 2016, significant budget cuts in the University of São Paulo own research funds and in Brazilian federal scientific agencies can compromise the continuity of this project.

Practical implications: The open source template called +GRAFIA that can freely help other areas of knowledge to build their own visual Web collaborative environments.

Originality/value: The collaborative nature of the ARQUIGRAFIA distinguishes it from institutional image databases on the internet, precisely because it involves a heterogeneous network of collaborators.

Key words: Metadata, Architectural images, Collaborative web environment, Digital repository

. [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2020, 5(1): 51-67.

Vânia Mara Alves Lima, Cibele Araújo Camargo Marques dos Santos, Artur Simões Rozestraten. The ARQUIGRAFIA project:A Web Collaborative Environment for Architecture and Urban Heritage Image[J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2020, 5(1): 51-67.

图/表 9

参考文献 28

1	Angus E., Stuart D., & Thelwall M. (2010). Flickr’s potential as an academic image resource:An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 42(4), 268-278.
2	Bradley P. (2011). From Flickr to Playbills: How to find the right images. CILIP UPDATE with gazette, (Jul), 23-23.
3	Cabré M.T. (1995). La terminologia hoy: Concepciones, tendências y aplicaciones. Ciência da Informação, 24(3), 289-298.
4	Dahlberg I. (2009). Brief communication: Concepts and terms—ISKO’s major challenge.Knowledge Organization, 36(2/3), 169-177.
5	Dahlberg I. (2011). Brief Communication: How to improve ISKO’s standing: Ten desiderata for knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, 38(1), 69-74.
6	Dahlberg I. (2014). Brief communication: What is knowledge organization? Knowledge Organization, 41(1), 85-91.
7	Dahlberg I. (1978). Teoria do conceito. Ciência da. Informação, 7(2), 101-107.
8	Font F., Serra J., & Serra X. (2013). Folksonomy-based tag recommendation for collaborative tagging systems. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 9(2), 1-30.
9	Gasser M. (2017). Research partnerships, user participation, extended outreach—some of ETH Library’s steps beyond digitisation. DH. Opportunities and Risks. Connecting Libraries and Research, Berlin, Germany: ffhal-01660814f.
10	Guerreiro D. ,&Borbinha J.L., (2014). Humanidades digitais novos desafios e oportunidades. Revista Internacional del Libro, Digitalización y Bibliotecas, 2(2), 63-75.
11	Gil-Leiva I. (2002). Consistence of document indexation involving novel indexers. Anales de Documentación, 5, 99-111.
12	Hodge G. (2000). Systems of knowledge organization for digital libraries: Beyond traditional authority files. Washington, DC: The digitalLibrary Federation.
13	Hojrland B. (2008). What is knowledge organization (KO)? Knowledge Organization, 35(2/3), 86-101.
14	Hughes A.V. , &Rafferty P., (2011). Inter-indexer consistency in graphic materials indexing at the National Library of Wales. Journal of Documentation, 67(1), 9-32.
15	International Standard Organization (2011). ISO 25964-1: Information and documentation—thesauri and interoperability with other vocabularies—part 1—thesauri for information retrieval. Geneva:ISO.
16	Lancaster F.W. (2004). Indexação e resumos: Teoria e prática. (2nd ed.). Brasília: Briquet de Lemos Livros.
17	Lima V.M.A., Costa I.G., & Guimarães M.O. (2017). A Organização do Conhecimento no domínio das Artes: o fazer terminológico na gestão do vocabulário controlado. Recife:Ed. UFPE.
18	Lima V.M.A., Rozestraten A.S., Santos C.A.C.M., Marques E.A., & Sampaio L.A. (2016). Arquigrafia: um repositório digital de imagens em ambiente colaborativo web. RBBD. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação (Online), 12, 103-107.
19	Moreiro González,J.A. (2011). Linguagens documentárias e vocabulários semânticos para a web: elementos conceituais. Salvador:EDUFBA.
20	National Information Standards Organization. (2010). Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual controlled vocabularies. Baltimore:NISO.
21	Osgood C.E. (1990). The nature and measurement of meaning. In Osgood, C.E., & Tzeng, O.C.S.(Eds.). Language, meaning and culture: The selected papers of C. E Osgood. New York:Praeger Publishers.
22	Rafferty P. (2018). “Tagging”. Knowledge Organization, 45(6), 500-516.
23	Rozestraten A.S., Andrade B.M., & Figueiredo F.G. (2018). Manual de Procedimentos Técnicos do Projeto ARQUIGRAFIA. 2nd. Ed. São Paulo: FAU/USP.
24	Rozestraten A.S., Chou A., Valentini S., Gerosa M.A., Reganati G., Valente C., & Claro R. (2013). Smart audio city guide: Um sistema colaborativo para apoio ao deslocamento urbano de pessoas com deficiência visual. Proceedings of the SBSC Conference (pp. 175-178).Porto Alegre: Brazilian Computer Society.
25	Rozestraten A.S., Lima V.M.A., & Santos C.A.C.M. (2017). ARQUIGRAFIA: Digital images in the collaborative environment on the Web. IFLA Satellite Meeting: Digital Humanities. Berlin. Hague: IFLA.
26	Rozestraten A.S., Martinez M.L., Gerosa A.M.A., Kon F., & Santos A.P.O. (2010). Rede social ARQUIGRAFIA-Brasil: Estudos iconográficos da Arquitetura Brasileira na web 2.0.Seminário Nacional de Documentação do Patrimônio Arquitetônico com o uso de Tecnologias Digitais. Salvador:UFBA.
27	Santos L.,& Santos, C.A.C.M. (2017). Arquigrafia: Um projeto de indexação de fotografias no meio digital, São Paulo. In: 25. Simpósio Internacional de Iniciação Científica e Tecnológica da USP. São Paulo: USP.
28	Wölfflin H. (1950). Principles of art history: The problem of the development of style in later art. New York:Dover Publications.

Image Metadata Level	Type of Information
Descriptive metadata	Title, Number of the classification, Name, Country, State, City, District, Street, Image author, Tags, Image date, Project author, Construction date, Notes, Date of registration number, Date of cataloging
Structural metadata	Dimensions, width, height, resolution, color depth, color model
Administrative metadata	License (Creative Commons), Harvesting, Donors, Authorization form for web distribution

The ARQUIGRAFIA project:A Web Collaborative Environment for Architecture and Urban Heritage Image

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 28

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价