Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis

doi:10.1515/jdis-2017-0003

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose

(1) To test basic assumptions underlying frequency-weighted citation analysis: (a) Uni-citations correspond to citations that are nonessential to the citing papers; (b) The influence of a cited paper on the citing paper increases with the frequency with which it is cited in the citing paper. (2) To explore the degree to which citation location may be used to help identify nonessential citations.

Design/methodology/approach

Each of the in-text citations in all research articles published in Issue 1 of the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 2016 was manually classified into one of these five categories: Applied, Contrastive, Supportive, Reviewed, and Perfunctory. The distributions of citations at different in-text frequencies and in different locations in the text by these functions were analyzed.

Findings

Filtering out nonessential citations before assigning weight is important for frequency-weighted citation analysis. For this purpose, removing citations by location is more effective than re-citation analysis that simply removes uni-citations. Removing all citation occurrences in the Background and Literature Review sections and uni-citations in the Introduction section appears to provide a good balance between filtration and error rates.

Research limitations

This case study suffers from the limitation of scalability and generalizability. We took careful measures to reduce the impact of other limitations of the data collection approach used. Relying on the researcher’s judgment to attribute citation functions, this approach is unobtrusive but speculative, and can suffer from a low degree of confidence, thus creating reliability concerns.

Practical implications

Weighted citation analysis promises to improve citation analysis for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation, and information retrieval. The present study showed the importance of filtering out nonessential citations before assigning weight in a weighted citation analysis, which may be a significant step forward to realizing these promises.

Originality/value

Weighted citation analysis has long been proposed as a theoretical solution to the problem of citation analysis that treats all citations equally, and has attracted increasing research interest in recent years. The present study showed, for the first time, the importance of filtering out nonessential citations in weighted citation analysis, pointing research in this area in a new direction.

Key words: Weighted citation analysis, Citation function, Research evaluation, In-text citation analysis, Re-citation analysis

Zhao Dangzhi,Cappello Alicia,Johnston Lucinda. "Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis." Journal of Data and Information Science, vol.2, no.1, 2017, pp.51-69. DOI: 10.1515/jdis-2017-0003

References

[1]	Bertram S. (1972). Citations counts. In A. Pitemick (Ed.), Fourth Annual Meeting, American Society for Information Science, Western Canada Chapter (pp. 61-67). Vancouver: University of British Columbia.
[2]	Bonzi S. (1982). Characteristics of a literature as predictors of relatedness between cited and citing works. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33(4), 208-216.
[3]	Borgman C.L., &Furner J., (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36(1), 3-72.
[4]	Bornmann L., & Daniel H.-D., (2008). What co-citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80.
[5]	Boyack K.W., Small H., & Klavans R. (2013). Improving the accuracy of co-citation clustering using full text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(9), 1759-1767.
[6]	Brooks T.A.(1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229.
[7]	Brooks T.A.(1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(1), 34-36.
[8]	Cano V.(1989). Citation behavior - Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(4), 284-290.
[9]	Case D.O., & Higgins G.M., (2000). How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(7), 635-645.
[10]	Cronin B.(1984). The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
[11]	Chubin D.E., & Moitra S.D., (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423-441.
[12]	Ding Y., & Cronin B., (2011). Popular and/or prestigious? Measures of scholarly esteem. Information Processing and Management, 47(1), 80-96.
[13]	Ding Y., Liu X., Guo C., & Cronin B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583-592.
[14]	Doumont J.(Ed.). (2010. English communication for scientists. Cambridge: NPG Education. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from
[15]	Dubin D.(2004). The most influential paper Gerard Salton never wrote. Library Trends, 52(4), 748-764.
[16]	Edge D.(1979). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review. History of Science Cambridge, 17(36), 102-134.
[17]	Garfield E.(1962. Can citation indexing be automated? Essays of an Information Scientists: 1962-1973, 84-90. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from .
[18]	Garfield E.(1979). Citation indexing - Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
[19]	Griffith B.C.(1990). Understanding science: Studies of communication and information. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (pp. 33-45). Newbury Park: Sage Publications, Inc.
[20]	Hall B.H., Jaffe A., & Trajtenberg M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics, 36(1), 16-38.
[21]	Hanney S., Frame I., Grant J., Buxton M., Young T., & Lewison G. (2005). Using categorizations of citations when assessing the outcomes of health research. Scientometrics, 65(3), 357-379.
[22]	Harwood N.(2008). Citers’ use of citees’ names: Findings from a qualitative interview-based study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 1007-1011.
[23]	Herlach G.(1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mention of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29(6), 308-310.
[24]	Hou W., Li M., & Niu D. (2011). Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution. BioEssays, 33(10), 724-727.
[25]	Jeong Y.K., Song M., & Ding Y. (2014). Content-based author co-citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 197-211.
[26]	Liu M.(1993). The complexities of citation practice: A review of citation studies. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 370-408.
[27]	McCain K.W., & Turner K., (1989). Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics. Scientometrics, 17(1), 127-163.
[28]	Merton R.K.(1942). Science and technology in a democratic order. Journal of Legal and Political Sociology, 1(1), 115-126.
[29]	Moravcsik M.J., & Murugesan P.(1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92.
[30]	Narin F.(1976). Evaluative bibliometrics: The use of publication and citation analysis in the evaluation of scientific activity. Washington, DC: Computer Horizons.
[31]	Peritz B.C.(1992). On the objectives of citation analysis: Problems of theory and method. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(6), 448-451.
[32]	Prabha C.G.(1983). Some aspects of citation behavior - A pilot-study in business administration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 34(3), 202-206.
[33]	Shadish W.R., Tolliver D., Gray M., & Gupta S.K.S. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498.
[34]	Small H.(1977). A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Social Studies of Science, 7(2), 139-166.
[35]	Small H.(1982). Citation context analysis. In B.J. Dervin & M.J. Voigt (Eds.), Progress in Communication Sciences, 3,(pp. 287-310). Norwood: Ablex.
[36]	Suppe F.(1998. The structure of a scientific paper. Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 381-405. Retrieved on September 22, 2016, from .
[37]	Tabatabaei N.(2013). Contribution of information science to other disciplines as reflected in citation contexts of highly cited JASIST papers. Montreal. (McGill University P.hD. dissertation)
[38]	Tang R., & Safer M.A.(2008). Author-rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation, 64(2), 246-272.
[39]	Teufel S., Siddharthan A., & Tidhar D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 103-110). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
[40]	Tran?y K.E. (1980). Norms of inquiry: Rationality, consistency requirements and normative conflict. In Rationality in Science (pp. 191-202). Springer Netherlands.
[41]	Vinkler P.(1987). A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics, 12(1), 47-72.
[42]	Voos H., & Dagaev K.S., (1976). Are all citations equal? Or Did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(6), 19-21.
[43]	White H.D.(1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. In C.L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, 84, 106. Newbury Park: Sage.
[44]	White M.D., & Wang P.L., (1997). A qualitative study of citing behavior: Contributions, criteria, and metalevel documentation concerns. Library Quarterly, 67(2), 122-154.
[45]	Zhao D., & Strotmann A., (2015a). Re-citation analysis: Promising for research evaluation, knowledge network analysis, knowledge representation and information retrieval? Proceedings of the 15th International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, June 30-July 3, 2015, Istanbul, Turkey.
[46]	Zhao D., & Strotmann A.,(2015b). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Williston, VT: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
[47]	Zhao D., & Strotmann A.,(2016). Dimensions and uncertainties of author citation rankings: Lessons learned from frequency-weighted in-text citation counting. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 671-682.
[48]	Zhu X., Turney P., Lemire D., & Vellino A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408-427.