[1] | Description of the Finnish higher education system, performance agreements and funding model in English: |
[2] | Aarrevaara T., Wahlfors L., & Dobson I. (2018). Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Finland. In Teixeira, Pedro et al.(eds.), Encyclopedia of International Higher Education Systems and Institutions, Springer 2018. |
[3] | De Boer H.F., Jongbloed B., Benneworth P., Cremonini L., Kolster R., Kottmann A., Lemmens-Krug K., & Vossensteyn H. (2015). Performance-based funding and performance agreements in fourteen higher education systems—Report for the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science, Enschede: CHEPS, University of Twente. Retrieved from . |
[4] | Jonkers K., &Zacharewicz , T. (2016). Research Performance Based Funding Systems: a Comparative Assessment. European Union . Retrieved from . |
[5] | Reports related to the development of the funding model and the publication indicator: |
[6] | Ministry of Education (2005). Yliopistojen tulosohjauksen kehitt?misty?ryhm? III (in English: Committee on the development of university performance management III). Helsinki:Opetusministeri?.Retrieved from |
[7] | Ministry of Education (2007). Bibliometristen aineistojen k?ytett?vyys yliopistojen julkaisujen laadun ja tuottavuuden arvioinnissa (in English: Usability of bibliometric data in evaluation of quality and productivity of universities’ publications). Helsinki: OPetusministeri?. Retrieved from . |
[8] | Ministry of Education (2008). Julkaisuk?yt?nn?t eri tieteenaloilla (in English: Publishing patterns in different fields).Helsinki:Opetusministeri?. Retrieved from |
[9] | Ministry of Education (2008).TiedeKOTA-ty?ryhm?n raportti (In English: Report of the TiedeKOTA working-group). Helsinki: Opetusministeri?. Retrieved from . |
[10] | Ministry of Education and Culture(2011). Laadukas, kansainv?linen, profiloitunut ja vaikuttava yliopisto - ehdotus yliopistojen rahoitusmalliksi vuodesta 2013 alkaen (In English: High-quality, profilised and effective international university - Proposal for a reform of the university financing model from 2013). Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?. Retrieved from 2011). Laadukas, kansainv?linen, profiloitunut ja vaikuttava yliopisto - ehdotus yliopistojen rahoitusmalliksi vuodesta 2013 alkaen (In English: High-quality, profilised and effective international university - Proposal for a reform of the university financing model from 2013). Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?. Retrieved from |
[11] | Ministry of Education and Culture (2014). Vahvemmat kannusteet koulutuksen ja tutkimuksen laadun vahvistamiselle: ehdotus yliopistojen rahoitusmallin tarkistamiseksi vuodesta 2015 alkaen (In English: Greater incentives for strengthening quality in education and research: A proposal for revising the funding model for universities as of 2015). Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?. Retrieved from |
[12] | Ministry of Education and Culture(2015). Ehdotus yliopistojen rahoitusmalliksi 2017 alkaen (In English: Proposal for the funding model of universities as of 2017).Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?. Retrieved from |
[13] | UNIFI (2010). Julkaisujen laadunarvioinnin kehitt?minen (In English: Development of evaluation of publication quality). Retrieved from . |
[14] | Ministry of education and culture: Retrieved from |
[15] | Budget spending proposals submitted to the Ministry of Finance: Retrieved from. |
[16] | Documents describing the development and properties of the publication channel rating: |
[17] | Auranen O., & P?l?nen, J. (2012. Classification of scientific publication channels: Final report of the Publication Forum project (2010-2012). Helsinki: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies. Retrieved from . |
[18] | P?l?nen J., & Ruth, A. S. (2015. Final report on 2014 review of ratings in Publication Forum. Helsinki: Federation of Finnish Learned Societies.Retrieved from . |
[19] | Publication Forum Manual for Panels (2018). |
[20] | User-guide (2018). Retrieved from . |
[21] | Publication Forum website: www.julkaisufoorumi.fi. |
[22] | JUFO-portal: Retrieved from. |
[23] | Label for peer-reviewed publications: Retrieved from |
[24] | Description of the properties of the national publication data: |
[25] | Sile L., Guns R., Sivertsen G.,& Engels , T. C. E. (2017). European Databases and Repositories for Social Sciences and Humanities Research Output. Antwerp: ECOOM & ENRESSH. Retrieved from 5172322.v2. |
[26] | Sile L., P?l?nen J., Sivertsen G., Guns R., Engels T., Arefievd P., Du?kováe M., Faurb?kf L., Hollg A., Kulczycki E., Nelhans G., Petr M., Piskk M., Soós S., Stojanovskil J., Stone A., ?u?olo J., & Teitelbaump R. (2018). Comprehensiveness of national bibliographic databases for social sciences and humanities: findings from a European survey, Research Evaluation doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvy016. |
[27] | Puuska H. M., Guns R., P?l?nen J., Sivertsen G., Ma?ana-Rodríguez J., & Engels T.C.E. (2018). Proof of concept of a European database for social sciences and humanities publications: Description of the VIRTA-ENRESSH pilot. Helsinki: CSC & ENRESSH. Retrieved from5993506. |
[28] | Publication data collection instructions for researchers (2018). Retrieved from |
[29] | VIPUNEN-portal for publication statistics. Retrieved from . |
[30] | JUULI-portal for browsing publication information. Retrieved from . |
[31] | Funding implications, other uses, effects and experiences: |
[32] | Auranen O., Leino Y., Poropudas O., & P?l?nen J. (2013).Julkaisufoorumi-luokitus ja viittausindeksit tieteellisten julkaisujen laadun mittarina. Web of Science -aineistoon perustuva vertailu (In English: Publication Forum ratings and citation scores as indicators of quality of scientific publications. A comparison based on Web of Science data), TaSTI Ty?raportteja 8/20132013). Julkaisufoorumi-luokitus ja viittausindeksit tieteellisten julkaisujen laadun mittarina. Web of Science -aineistoon perustuva vertailu (In English: Publication Forum ratings and citation scores as indicators of quality of scientific publications. A comparison based on Web of Science data), TaSTI Ty?raportteja 8/2013. Retrieved from . |
[33] | Auranen O., &P?l?nen J. (2014). Julkaisufoorumi-luokitus ja kansallinen julkaiseminen(In English: Publication Forum rating and national publishing).In Muhonen Reetta, Puuska, Hanna-Mari (eds.) Tutkimuksen kansallinen teht?v?. Tampere: Vaystapaino, 153-175. |
[34] | Hakala J., & Roihuvuo, J. (2014). Research Assessment Exercise at The University of Tampere 2014: Final Report. Tampere: The University of TampereTampere: The University of Tampere. |
[35] | Lyytinen A., Muhonen R., Koskinen O., & Eskola O. (2016).Ulkomaiset tutkijat ja julkaisuaktiivisuus (In English: Foreign researchers and their publishing frequency), Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?n julkaisuja 2016:16Retrieved from. |
[36] | Meril?inen S. (2015). Julkaisufoorumin tasoluokitus: ovatko vaihtoehtoiset l?hestymistavat ja poikkitieteellinen tutkimus uhattuina?: Puheenvuoro (In English: Publication Forum ratings: are alternative approaches and interdisciplinary research threatened?).Sukupuolentutkimus 28:3, 45-50 |
[37] | Ministry of Education and Culture(2015). Suomalaisen yliopistotutkimuksen tuottavuus ja vaikuttavuus: opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?n profiiliryhm?n raportti (In English: Productivity and impact of Finnish university research.Report by the profile working group of the Ministry of Education and Culture), Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?n julkaisuja 2015:5.Retrieved from2015. |
[38] | >Ministry of Education and Culture (2016). Yliopistolakiuudistuksen vaikutusten arviointi(In English: Impact evaluation of the Universities Act reform). Helsinki: Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?.Retrieved from |
[39] | Muhonen R., Eskola O., Leino Y., & P?l?nen J.Tutkimuksen monitieteisyys ja laatu (In English: The multidisciplinary nature and quality of research), Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeri?n julkaisuja 2016:12.Retrieved from . |
[40] | Pihlstr?m S. (2014). Academic publishing and interdisciplinarity: Finnish experiences. Human Affairs 24, 40-47. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-014-0204-2. |
[41] | Poropudas O. (2018). Miksi suomalaisen tutkimuksen tuottavuus kasvoi, mutta laatu heikentyi? (In English: Why the productivity of Finnish Research Increased but quality decreased?). Informaatiotutkimus 37:1, 5-16. Retrieved from 31174. |
[42] | Puuska H. M.(2014). Scholarly Publishing Patterns in Finland. Tampere:University of Tampere. Retrieved from . |
[43] | P?l?nen J.,& Auranen O. (2017). Julkaisupaine suomalaisessa tiedeyhteis?ss? (In English, Publishing pressure in Finnish research community).Informaatiotutkimus, 36(2), 23-41.Retrieved from |
[44] | P?l?nen J., Auranen O., Engels T., & Kulczycki E. (2018). Taking national language publications into account: the case of the Finnish performance-based research funding system. STI 2018 Conference Proceedings. Retrieved from |
[45] | P?l?nen J.,& Sivertsen, G.(2017). Experiences with the rating of publication channels for the Nordic ModelWith a response to a proposal for automated ratings from Saarela et al.. (2016) Presentation at the 22nd Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy. Retrieved from |
[46] | P?l?nen J.,&Wahlfors L. (2016). Local use of a national rating of publication channels in Finnish universities. Poster presented at the 21st Nordic Workshop on Bibliometrics and Research Policy. Retrieved from |
[47] | Saarela M., K?rkk?inen T., Lahtonen T.,& Rossi , T.(2016). Expert-based versus citation-based ranking of scholarly and scientific publication channels. Journal of Informetrics 10, 693-718. Retrieved from 2016.03.004. |
[48] | Seuri A., &Vartiainen H. (2018). Yliopistojen rahoitus,kannustimet ja rakennekehitys(In English: University funding, incentives and structural development).Helsinki: Economic Policy Council.Retrieved from |
[49] | Sivula A., Suominen J., & Reunanen M. (2015. A1 alkuper?isartikkeli tieteellisess? aikakauslehdess?. Uusien julkaisuk?yt?nteiden omaksuminen ihmistieteiss? 2000-luvulla (In English: A1 original research article in scientific journal. Embracing new publishing practices in social sciences and humanities in the 21st century) Kasvatus & Aika 9(3), 149-171. Retrieved from. |
[50] | T?htinen H., Rautava P., & Happonen R. P. (2014). EVO-pisteiden ja Julkaisufoorumin tasoluokituksen vertailu terveystutkimuksen arvioinnissa (In English: Comparison of EVO-points and Publication Forum level ratings for evaluation of health research)Suomen L??k?rilehti69(10), 714-719. |
[51] | Wahlfors L., &P?l?nen J. (2018). Julkaisufoorumi-luokituksen k?ytt? yliopistoissa(In English: The use of Publication Forum ratings in universties.Hallinnon tutkimus 37(1), 7-21. |
[52] | Wang L., Vuolanto P., & Muhonen R. (2014) Bibliometrics in the research assessment exercise reports of Finnish universities and the relevant international perspectives, University of Tampere 2014Retrieved from. |