An Automatic Method to Identify Citations to Journals in News Stories: A Case Study of UK Newspapers Citing Web of Science Journals

doi:10.2478/jdis-2019-0016

Abstract

Abstract:

Purpose Communicating scientific results to the public is essential to inspire future researchers and ensure that discoveries are exploited. News stories about research are a key communication pathway for this and have been manually monitored to assess the extent of press coverage of scholarship.

Design/methodology/Approach: To make larger scale studies practical, this paper introduces an automatic method to extract citations from newspaper stories to large sets of academic journals. Curated ProQuest queries were used to search for citations to 9,639 Science and 3,412 Social Science Web of Science (WoS) journals from eight UK daily newspapers during 2006-2015. False matches were automatically filtered out by a new program, with 94% of the remaining stories meaningfully citing research.

Findings: Most Science (95%) and Social Science (94%) journals were never cited by these newspapers. Half of the cited Science journals covered medical or health-related topics, whereas 43% of the Social Sciences journals were related to psychiatry or psychology. From the citing news stories, 60% described research extensively and 53% used multiple sources, but few commented on research quality.

Research limitations: The method has only been tested in English and from the ProQuest Newspapers database.

Practical implications: Others can use the new method to systematically harvest press coverage of research.

Originality/value An automatic method was introduced and tested to extract citations from newspaper stories to large sets of academic journals.

Key words: Citation analysis, News stories, Public engagement, Public impact, UK newspapers, Web of Science journals

Kayvan Kousha,Mike Thelwall. "An Automatic Method to Identify Citations to Journals in News Stories: A Case Study of UK Newspapers Citing Web of Science Journals." Journal of Data and Information Science, vol.4, no.3, 2019, pp.73-95. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2019-0016

References

1	Bartlett C., Sterne J.,& Egger M. (2002). What is newsworthy? Longitudinal study of the reporting of medical research in two British newspapers. British Medical Journal, 325(7355), 81-84.
2	Brodie M., Hamel E. C., Altman D. E., Blendon R. J.,& Benson J. M. (2003). Health news and the American public, 1996-2002. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28(5), 927-950.
3	Chang C.(2015). Inaccuracy in health research news: A typology and predictions of scientists’ perceptions of the accuracy of research news. Journal of Health Communication, 20(2), 177-186.
4	Clark F.,&Illman D. L. (2006). A longitudinal study of the New York Times science times section. Science Communication, 27(4), 496-513.
5	Conrad P.(1999). Uses of expertise: Sources, quotes, and voice in the reporting of genetics in the news. Public Understanding of Science, 8(4), 285-302.
6	De Semir, V., Ribas, C., & Revuelta, G. (1998). Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 294-295. doi:10.1001/jama.280.3.294
7	Dudo A.(2015). Scientists, the media, and the public communication of science. Sociology Compass, 9(9), 761-775. doi:10.1111/soc4.12298
8	Entwistle V.(1995). Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. BMJ, 310(6984), 920.
9	Evans W.(1995). The mundane and the arcane: Prestige media coverage of social and natural science. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 168-177.
10	Fanelli D.(2013). Any publicity is better than none: Newspaper coverage increases citations, in the UK more than in Italy. Scientometrics, 95(3), 1167-1177. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0925-0
11	Fogg-Rogers L., Grand A.,& Sardo M. (2015). Beyond dissemination—science communication as impact. Journal of Science Communication, 14(3), C01-CO7.
12	Landis J.R. &Koch G.G.(1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
13	Lewison G.(2002). From biomedical research to health improvement. Scientometrics, 54(2), 179-192. doi:10.1023/A:1016005710371
14	Lewison G.,&Turnbull T.(2010). News in brief and features in new scientist magazine and the biomedical research papers that they cite, August 2008 to July 2009. Scientometrics, 85(1), 345-359.
15	Lewison G., Tootell S., Roe P.,& Sullivan R. (2008). How do the media report cancer research? A study of the UK’s BBC website. British Journal of Cancer, 99(4), 569-576.
16	Mellor F., Webster S., & Bell A. R. (2011) Content analysis of the BBC’s science coverage. Science Communication Group, Imperial College London.
17	Moriarty C. M., Jensen J. D.,& Stryker J. E. (2010). Frequently cited sources in cancer news coverage: A content analysis examining the relationship between cancer news content and source citation. Cancer Causes and Control, 21(1), 41-49.
18	Moynihan R., Bero L., Ross-Degnan D., Henry D., Lee K., Watkins J.,& Soumerai S. B. (2000). Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(22), 1645-1650.
19	Pellechia , M.G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6(1), 49-68.
20	Porter , M.F. (1980). An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14(3), 130-137.
21	Sch?fer,M. S. (2012). Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science, 21(6), 650-663.
22	Van Trigt A. M., De Jong-Van Den Berg, L. T. W., Haaijer-Ruskamp F. M., Willems J.,& Tromp, T. F. J. (1994). Journalists and their sources of ideas and information on medicines. Social Science and Medicine, 38(4), 637-643.
23	Weigold M.F. (2001). Communicating science: A review of the literature. Science Communication, 23(2), 164-193.
24	Weitkamp E.(2003). British newspapers privilege health and medicine topics over other science news. Public Relations Review 29(3), 321-33.

[1]	Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Magda León Santos, Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge. Evolution of the Socio-cognitive Structure of Knowledge Management (1986-2015): An Author Co-citation Analysis [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2019, 4(2): 36-55.
[2]	Liang Guoqiang, Hou Haiyan, Hu Zhigang, Huang Fu, Wang Yajie, Zhang Shanshan. Usage Count: A New Indicator to Detect Research Fronts [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 2(1): 89-104.
[3]	Zhao Dangzhi, Cappello Alicia, Johnston Lucinda. Functions of Uni- and Multi-citations: Implications for Weighted Citation Analysis [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 2(1): 51-69.
[4]	Jian DU, Bin ZHANG, Yang LI, Xiaoli TANG & Peiyang XU. A causational analysis of scholars' years of active academic careers vis-à-vis their academic productivity and academic influence [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2011, 4(2): 77-91.
[5]	ZHANG Yang & ZHANG Jie. An Informetric analysis of web citation in Chinese journals of Library and Information Science in recent years [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2010, 3(3): 46-62.