Journal of Data and Information Science ›› 2020, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4): 86-115.doi: 10.2478/jdis-2020-0027
• Research Paper • Previous Articles Next Articles
Haotian Hu1,3, Dongbo Wang2,(), Sanhong Deng1,3
Received:
2020-01-31
Revised:
2020-05-13
Accepted:
2020-06-11
Online:
2020-09-20
Published:
2020-11-20
Contact:
Dongbo Wang
E-mail:db.wang@njau.edu.cn
Table 1
Top 20 AI publications and their paper amounts between 1985 and 2019.
Rank | Journals | Papers | Percent (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS | 461 | 1.206% |
2 | IEEE ACCESS | 290 | 0.759% |
3 | AI MAGAZINE | 233 | 0.610% |
4 | ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 220 | 0.576% |
5 | APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING | 192 | 0.502% |
6 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 191 | 0.500% |
7 | SENSORS | 152 | 0.398% |
8 | NEUROCOMPUTING | 139 | 0.364% |
9 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW | 122 | 0.319% |
10 | NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS | 122 | 0.319% |
11 | JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS | 114 | 0.298% |
12 | MINDS AND MACHINES | 111 | 0.290% |
13 | INFORMATION SCIENCES | 105 | 0.275% |
14 | KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS | 104 | 0.272% |
15 | ENERGIES | 103 | 0.269% |
16 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE | 99 | 0.259% |
17 | APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE | 96 | 0.251% |
18 | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH | 96 | 0.251% |
19 | AGRO FOOD INDUSTRY HI-TECH | 94 | 0.246% |
20 | KYBERNETES | 93 | 0.243% |
Table 2
Countries/regions with high BC in the collaborative network.
Rank | Country/region | BC | Degree |
---|---|---|---|
1 | US | 0.194044287 | 59 |
2 | Spain | 0.121497557 | 45 |
3 | France | 0.09336937 | 47 |
4 | UK | 0.08893566 | 53 |
5 | Malaysia | 0.066529876 | 26 |
6 | Italy | 0.049736817 | 39 |
7 | Slovenia | 0.046246703 | 17 |
8 | China | 0.044717068 | 45 |
9 | Germany | 0.044155013 | 41 |
10 | Australia | 0.041308894 | 37 |
11 | Serbia | 0.025974026 | 3 |
12 | Canada | 0.025611038 | 37 |
13 | Iran | 0.022606583 | 28 |
14 | Poland | 0.019977656 | 23 |
15 | Netherlands | 0.017546622 | 33 |
16 | Saudi Arabia | 0.014945119 | 19 |
17 | Russia | 0.013316129 | 20 |
18 | Vietnam | 0.01329915 | 22 |
19 | Portugal | 0.013039462 | 27 |
20 | India | 0.011128811 | 32 |
Table 3
Countries and regions with a high percentage of collaboration in the global field of AI between 1985 and 2019.
Rank | Country/region | Total papers | Collaborative papers | Percentage of collaborative papers |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Vietnam | 189 | 170 | 89.95% |
2 | Saudi Arabia | 344 | 277 | 80.52% |
3 | U Arab Emirates | 128 | 99 | 77.34% |
4 | Pakistan | 301 | 229 | 76.08% |
5 | Sweden | 332 | 251 | 75.60% |
6 | Switzerland | 365 | 266 | 72.88% |
7 | Denmark | 173 | 126 | 72.83% |
8 | Netherlands | 578 | 402 | 69.55% |
9 | Tunisia | 158 | 109 | 68.99% |
10 | Iran | 1,279 | 880 | 68.80% |
11 | Slovenia | 156 | 107 | 68.59% |
12 | Malaysia | 737 | 499 | 67.71% |
13 | Portugal | 461 | 310 | 67.25% |
14 | Belgium | 310 | 206 | 66.45% |
15 | France | 1,444 | 954 | 66.07% |
16 | Egypt | 262 | 173 | 66.03% |
17 | Australia | 1,180 | 773 | 65.51% |
18 | New Zealand | 152 | 99 | 65.13% |
19 | Singapore | 455 | 289 | 63.52% |
20 | Colombia | 133 | 84 | 63.16% |
21 | Serbia | 160 | 101 | 63.13% |
22 | Finland | 234 | 146 | 62.39% |
23 | Israel | 218 | 136 | 62.39% |
24 | Spain | 1,960 | 1,218 | 62.14% |
25 | Italy | 1,377 | 855 | 62.09% |
26 | Turkey | 909 | 561 | 61.72% |
27 | Mexico | 459 | 283 | 61.66% |
28 | Norway | 191 | 117 | 61.26% |
29 | UK | 3,070 | 1,863 | 60.68% |
30 | Canada | 1,463 | 877 | 59.95% |
31 | Taiwan | 888 | 532 | 59.91% |
32 | South Korea | 869 | 516 | 59.38% |
33 | Brazil | 1,077 | 638 | 59.24% |
34 | Greece | 500 | 291 | 58.20% |
35 | Germany | 1,538 | 892 | 58.00% |
36 | Austria | 337 | 193 | 57.27% |
37 | USA | 7,763 | 4,436 | 57.14% |
38 | Japan | 1,239 | 697 | 56.26% |
39 | China | 6,444 | 3,596 | 55.80% |
40 | Ireland | 206 | 114 | 55.34% |
41 | Algeria | 204 | 111 | 54.41% |
42 | Thailand | 151 | 80 | 52.98% |
43 | Indonesia | 180 | 95 | 52.78% |
44 | India | 2,080 | 1,092 | 52.50% |
45 | South Africa | 205 | 105 | 51.22% |
46 | Hungary | 159 | 81 | 50.94% |
47 | Russia | 540 | 267 | 49.44% |
48 | Czech Republic | 379 | 164 | 43.27% |
49 | Slovakia | 143 | 61 | 42.66% |
50 | Romania | 627 | 263 | 41.95% |
51 | Poland | 866 | 360 | 41.57% |
Table 4
Institutions with high BC in the biggest sub-network of international-institution collaboration network.
Rank | Institution | Country | BC | Degree |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Chinese Academy of Sciences | China | 0.405336672 | 4 |
2 | Ton Duc Thang University | Vietnam | 0.384635685 | 18 |
3 | Georgia Institute of Technology | USA | 0.371527778 | 3 |
4 | University of Alberta | Canada | 0.350694444 | 4 |
5 | University of Kurdistan | Iran | 0.295375309 | 14 |
6 | Islamic Azad University | Iran | 0.288076771 | 11 |
7 | Duy Tan University | Vietnam | 0.223353933 | 13 |
8 | MIT | USA | 0.203373016 | 4 |
9 | University of Tabriz | Iran | 0.153155313 | 7 |
10 | Oxford | UK | 0.12202381 | 5 |
11 | University of Technology Malaysia | Malaysia | 0.095804022 | 5 |
12 | Penn State University | USA | 0.091765873 | 3 |
13 | University of Tehran | Iran | 0.039564365 | 3 |
14 | University of Technology Sydney | Australia | 0.036280213 | 5 |
15 | Near East University | Turkey | 0.033982326 | 3 |
16 | Sejong University | South Korea | 0.032871873 | 5 |
17 | University of Malaya | Malaysia | 0.031909121 | 3 |
18 | GTEV ReX Ltd | UK | 0.03125 | 2 |
19 | University of Toronto | Canada | 0.03125 | 2 |
20 | Hong Kong Polytechnic University | China | 0.03125 | 3 |
21 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | 0.030505952 | 4 |
22 | Johns Hopkins University | USA | 0.030505952 | 4 |
23 | University of Southern Queensland | Australia | 0.028754488 | 4 |
24 | University of Salamanca | Spain | 0.015376984 | 3 |
25 | Osaka Institute of Technology | Japan | 0.015376984 | 3 |
26 | Korea Institute of Geoscience & Mineral Resources KIGAM | South Korea | 0.006101012 | 4 |
27 | Korea University of Science & Technology | South Korea | 0.005030213 | 3 |
28 | University of South Eastern Norway | Norway | 0.005030213 | 2 |
29 | University College of Southeast Norway | Norway | 0.003571429 | 2 |
30 | UTM | Malaysia | 0.003515133 | 4 |
31 | Xi’an University of Science & Technology | China | 0.001070799 | 3 |
32 | Nanjing Normal University | China | 0.001070799 | 2 |
33 | Hanoi University | Vietnam | 0.000907137 | 2 |
34 | Obuda University | Hungary | 0.000496032 | 3 |
[1] |
Aleixandre-Tudó, J.L., Castelló-Cogollos, L., Aleixandre, J.L., & Aleixandre-Benavent, R. (2019). Renewable energies: Worldwide trends in research, funding and international collaboration. Renewable Energy, 139, 268-278.
doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.079 |
[2] |
Cai, Y., Ramis Ferrer, B & Luis Martinez Lastra, J. (2019). Building University-Industry Co-Innovation Networks in Transnational Innovation Ecosystems: Towards a Transdisciplinary Approach of Integrating Social Sciences and Artificial Intelligence. Sustainability, 11(17), 4633.
doi: 10.3390/su11174633 |
[3] |
Chen, X., Xie, H., Wang, F.L., Liu, Z., Xu, J., & Hao, T. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of natural language processing in medical research. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 18(1), 14.
doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0594-x |
[4] |
Dinić, B.M., & Jevremov, T. (2019). Trends in research related to the Dark Triad: A bibliometric analysis. Current Psychology, 1-10.
doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00761-w pmid: 32421031 |
[5] |
Doğan, G., & Kayır, S. (2020). Global scientific outputs of brain death publications and evaluation according to the religions of countries. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(1), 96-112.
doi: 10.1007/s10943-019-00886-8 pmid: 31317465 |
[6] |
Frey, C.D., Wilson, T.A., Decamillis, M., Wilson, T., Wilson, J.A., Wolfe, S.Q., & Fargen, K.M. (2017). A pilot study of the level of evidence and collaboration in published neurosurgical research. World Neurosurgery, 108, 901-908.
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.09.011 pmid: 28899833 |
[7] |
Gao, F., Jia, X., Zhao, Z., Chen, C.C., Xu, F., Geng, Z., & Song, X. (2019). Bibliometric analysis on tendency and topics of artificial intelligence over last decade. Microsystem Technologies, 1-13.
doi: 10.1007/s00542-020-05051-w pmid: 33041523 |
[8] |
Godoy, D., Zunino, A., & Mateos, C. (2015). Publication practices in the Argentinian Computer Science community: a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1795-1814.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1450-0 |
[9] | Hu, H.T., Wang, D.B., & Huang, S.Q. (2019). International collaboration in the field of artificial intelligence: global trends and networks at the country level. In Proceedings of the17th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI2019, v2 (pp. 2501-2502). |
[10] |
Koehler, W. (2001). Information science as “Little Science”: The implications of a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. Scientometrics, 51(1), 117-132.
doi: 10.1023/A:1010516712215 |
[11] |
Miller, T. (2019). Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence, 267, 1-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2018.07.007 |
[12] |
Niu, J., Tang, W., Xu, F., Zhou, X., & Song, Y. (2016). Global research on artificial intelligence from 1990-2014: Spatially-explicit bibliometric analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(5), 66.
doi: 10.3390/ijgi5050066 |
[13] |
Pan, W., Jian, L., & Liu, T. (2019). Grey system theory trends from 1991 to 2018: A bibliometric analysis and visualization. Scientometrics, 121(3), 1407-1434.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03256-z |
[14] |
Pee, L.G., Pan, S.L., & Cui, L. (2019). Artificial intelligence in healthcare robots: A social informatics study of knowledge embodiment. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 351-369.
doi: 10.1002/asi.2019.70.issue-4 |
[15] |
Peng, X., & Dai, J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of neutrosophic set: Two decades review from 1998 to 2017. Artificial Intelligence Review, 1-57.
doi: 10.1007/s10462-020-09852-3 pmid: 32836651 |
[16] |
Shukla, A.K., Janmaijaya, M., Abraham, A., & Muhuri, P.K. (2019). Engineering applications of artificial intelligence: A bibliometric analysis of 30 years (1988-2018). Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 85, 517-532.
doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2019.06.010 |
[17] | Sohn, E., Noh, K.R., Lee, B., & Kwon, O.J. (2018). Bibliometric network analysis and visualization of research and development trends in Precision Medicine. In Proceedings of 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)(pp. 727-730). IEEE. |
[18] | Tang, K.Y., Chou, T.L., & Tsai, C.C. (2019). A content analysis of computational thinking research: An international publication trends and research typology. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-11. |
[19] |
Tarazona-Alvarez, B., Lucas-Dominguez, R., Paredes-Gallardo, V., Alonso-Arroyo, A., & Vidal-Infer, A. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of scientific production in the field of lingual orthodontics. Head & Face Medicine, 15(1), 23.
doi: 10.1186/s13005-019-0207-7 pmid: 31493796 |
[20] |
Tsay, M.Y. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998-2008. Scientometrics, 89(2), 591.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0460-4 |
[21] |
Wu, Y., & Duan, Z. (2015). Social network analysis of international scientific collaboration on psychiatry research. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 9(1), 2.
doi: 10.1186/1752-4458-9-2 pmid: 25598839 |
[1] | David E. Hubbard, Sierra Laddusaw. Acknowledgment of Libraries in the Journal Literature: An Exploratory Study [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2020, 5(3): 178-186. |
[2] | Jian Qin. Knowledge Organization and Representation under the AI Lens [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2020, 5(1): 3-17. |
[3] | Carlos Luis González-Valiente, Magda León Santos, Ricardo Arencibia-Jorge. Evolution of the Socio-cognitive Structure of Knowledge Management (1986-2015): An Author Co-citation Analysis [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2019, 4(2): 36-55. |
[4] | Garner Jon,L. Porter Alan,Leidolf Andreas,Baker Michelle. Measuring and Visualizing Research Collaboration and Productivity [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2018, 3(1): 54-81. |
[5] | Luan Chunjuan, Porter Alan L.. Insight into the Disciplinary Structure of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 2(1): 70-88. |
[6] | Yating LI & Bin ZHANG. A comparative study on institutional collaboration characteristics in EM and LIS in China [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2015, 7(4): 62-77. |
[7] | Xian ZHANG, Haiyun XU, Shu FANG, Zhengyin HU & Shuying LI. Building potential patent portfolios: An integrated approach based on topic identification and correlation analysis [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2015, 7(2): 39-51. |
[8] | Chunlei YE. Mapping the evolution of research topics using ATM and SNA [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2014, 7(4): 46-62. |
[9] | Yang ZHANG & Wanyang LING. A comparative study of information diffusion in weblogs and microblogs based on social network analysis [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2012, 5(4): 51-66. |
[10] | Junping QIU, Feifei WANG & Houqiang YU. A case study on knowledge communication based on friends-list links in the science blogging community at Sciencenet.cn [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2011, 4(3/4): 49-67. |
[11] | ZHAO Yuxiang, Wu Kewen & ZHU Qinghua . Evaluations on social network analysis (SNA) research in Mainland China: A critical assessment of journal literatures [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2010, 3(4): 37-60. |
[12] | Li-Ping KU. Introduction to information seeking behavior—A review of literature and field practice directions [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2010, 3(1): 65-78. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||