Why Open Government Data? The Case of a Swedish Municipality

doi:10.2478/jdis-2021-0012

Abstract

Abstract:

Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory study is to provide modern local governments with potential use cases for their open data, in order to help inform related future policies and decision-making. The concrete context was that of the V?xj? municipality located in southeastern Sweden.
Design/methodology/approach: The methodology was two-fold: 1) a survey of potential end users (n=151) from a local university; and, 2) analysis of survey results using a theoretical model regarding local strategies for implementing open government data.
Findings: Most datasets predicted to be useful were on: sustainability and environment; preschool and school; municipality and politics. The use context given is primarily research and development, informing policies and decision making; but also education, informing personal choices, informing citizens and creating services based on open data. Not the least, the need for educating target user groups on data literacy emerged. A tentative pattern comprising a technical perspective on open data and a social perspective on open government was identified.
Research limitations: In line with available funding, the nature of the study was exploratory and implemented as an anonymous web-based survey of employees and students at the local university. Further research involving (qualitative) surveys with all stakeholders would allow for creating a more complete picture of the matter.
Practical implications: The study determines potential use cases and use contexts for open government data, in order to help inform related future policies and decision-making.
Originality/value: Modern local governments, and especially in Sweden, are faced with a challenge of how to make their data open, how to learn about which types of data will be most relevant for their end users and what will be different societal purposes. The paper contributes to knowledge that modern local governments can resort to when it comes to attitudes of local citizens to open government data in the context of an open government data perspective.

Key words: Open data, E-government, Open government

Golub, Koraljka, and Arwid Lund. "Why Open Government Data? The Case of a Swedish Municipality." Journal of Data and Information Science, vol.6, no.1, 2021, pp.120-138. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2021-0012

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1

Table 2

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

References 35

[1]	Baack, S. (2015). Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism. Big Data Society, July-December 2015, 1-11.
[2]	Bergsman, L.G. (2020). Hur länge har kommunen haft sin portal för öppna data? [Personal communication].
[3]	Borgman, C.L. (2015). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.
[4]	DIGG. (2019a). Uppdrag att öka den offentliga förvaltningens förmåga att tillgängliggöra öppna data, bedriva öppen och datadriven innovation samt använda artificiell intelligens (Dnr: 2019-139; Delrapport i regeringsuppdraget I2019/01416/DF samt I2019/01020/DF (delvis), p. 14). https://www.digg.se/4a3a84/globalassets/dokument/publicerat/publikationer/delrapport-oppna-data-oppen-och-datadriven-innovation-samt-ai.pdf
[5]	DIGG. (2019b). Förvaltnings-och finansieringsförslag för dataportal. se: Bilaga 2 till Delrapport avseende regeringsuppdrag rörande öppna data, öppen och datadriven innovation samt AI (Dnr: 2019-139; p.11). Myndigheten för digital förvaltning.
[6]	DIGG. (2020). Principer för att tillgängliggöra information—DIGG. DIGG - Myndighet. https://www.digg.se/utveckling-av-digital-forvaltning/sveriges-dataportal/principer#princip_6:_dokumentera_och_beskriv_information
[7]	Frick, A. (2015). Öppna data: En omvärldsanalys med nulägesstatus. Internetstiftelsen.
[8]	Gascó-Hernándeza, M., Martin, E.G., Reggi, L., Pyo, S., & Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2018). Promoting the use of open government data: Cases of training and engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 2(35), 233-42.
[9]	Gruen, N. (2009). Engage: Getting on with government 2.0 report of the government 2.0 taskforce. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://www.finance.gov.au/sites/default/files/Government20TaskforceReport.pdf?v=1
[10]	Harrison, T.M., Pardo, T.A., & Cook, M. (2012). Creating open government ecosystems: A research and development agenda. Future Internet, 4(4), 900-28.
[11]	HM, Treasury. (2009). Putting the frontline first: Smarter government. London: HM Government; 2009. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228889/7753.pdf
[12]	Hossain, M., & Chan, C. (2016). Open data adoption in Australian government agencies: An exploratory study. In F. Burstein, H. Scheepers, & G. Deegan (Eds.), Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) 2015. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.02500
[13]	Kalin, I. (2014). Open data policy improves democracy. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 59-70.
[14]	Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. Los Angeles, Ca.: SAGE.
[15]	Lassinanti, J., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2014). Shaping local open data initiatives: Politics and implications. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 17-33.
[16]	Lee, G., & Hoon Kwak, Y. (2011). An open government implementation model: Moving to increased public engagement. Retrieved June 15, 2018, from http://www-07.ibm.com/events/au/smartergovernment/pdf/An_Open_Government_Implementation_Model.pdf
[17]	Liljeqvist, P., Nordfeldt, A., Warnolf, A., & Holmdahl, C. (2020). Innovation genom information: Huvudbetänkande av Öppna data-utredningen (SOU 2020:55;Statens Offentliga Utredningar).
[18]	Manyika, J., Chui, M., Groves, P., Farrell, D, Van Kuiken, S., & Doshi, E.A. (2013). Open data: Unlocking innovation and performance with liquid information. San Francisco, Ca.: The McKinsey Global Institute.
[19]	Martin, E.G, Helbig, N., Birkhead, G.S. (2015). Opening health data: What do researchers want?: Early experiences with New York’s open health data platform. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 21(5), 1-7. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25105279
[20]	Máchová, R., Hub, M., & Lnenicka, M. (2018). Usability evaluation of open data portals: Evaluating data discoverability, accessibility, and reusability from a stakeholders’ perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(3), 252-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0026
[21]	Milan, S., & Gutiérrez, M. (2015). Medios ciudadanos y big data: la emergencia del activismo de datos. Mediaciones, 14(11), 10-26.
[22]	OECD. (2018). Open Government Data Report:Enhancing policy maturity for sustainable impact (OECD Digital Government Studies). OECD Publishing.
[23]	OECD. (2019). Government at a Glance 2019 \| en \| OECD. http://www.oecd.org/gov/government-at-a-glance-22214399.htm doi: 10.1111/jfb.14676 pmid: 33452810
[24]	Open Government Partnership. (2018). About OGP: Open Government Partnership. Retrieved from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/about/about-ogp
[25]	Publications Office of the European Union. (2019). Open data maturity report 2019. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2830/073835
[26]	Publications office of the European Union. (2020). Användningsfall \| Europeiska Data Portalen. Användningsfall Europeiska Data Portalen. https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sv/impact-studies/use-cases
[27]	Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity 22(1), 1-24.
[28]	Shekarabi, A., & K., Aldén. (2016). Uppdrag till Riksarkivet att främja statliga myndigheters arbete med att tillgängliggöra data för vidareutnyttjande. Retrieved from https://riksarkivet.se/Media/pdf-filer/uppdrag-till-Riksarkivet_16juni2016.pdf
[29]	Skellefteå Kommun, S. (2018). Kommunfakta. Kommunfakta. https://www.skelleftea.se/kommun/om-skelleftea
[30]	Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives (Rep. No. 22). Paris: OECD Publishing.
[31]	Växjö, kommun. (2020). Växjö kommun—Öppna geografiska data. https://data-vaxjo.opendata.arcgis.com/
[32]	Weerakkody, V., Kawaljeet, K., Balta, M.A., Irani, Z., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2017). Factors influencing user acceptance of public sector big open data. Production Planning & Control, 28(11-12), 891-905.
[33]	White, House. (2009a). Memorandum on transparency and open government:. Washington, DC White House.
[34]	White, House. (2009b). Memorandum on freedom of information act. Washington, DC: White House.
[35]	Zhu, X., & Freeman, M.A. (2019). An evaluation of U.S. municipal open data portals: A user interaction framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 70(1), 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24081

	Stockholm local strategy on OGD	Skellefte? local strategy on OGD
Target groups	Technical experts and companies	Local community and (young) citizens
Desired practical outcomes	Development of economically sustainable and revenue driven services	Empowered citizens’ collaboration for public sector innovation
General aim	Open data platform for economic growth	Regional co-operation and co-creation of social growth
Strategy	Top-down approach	Broader and more reflective approach

Age range	<18	18-25	26-35	36-45	46-55	56-65	Over 65
Number of respondents	0 (0%)	10 (6.62%)	26 (17.22%)	37 (24.50%)	38 (25.17%)	34 (22.52%)	6 (3.97%)
Total	151 (100%)