[1] |
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E. et al. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82, 391-400.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0047-5
|
[2] |
Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Bordons, M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. JASIST, 61, 1564-1581.
|
[3] |
Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80, 625-636.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-2094-3
|
[4] |
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L. et al. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429-431.
doi: 10.1038/520429a
|
[5] |
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 102, 16569-16572.
|
[6] |
Hirsch, J.E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104, 19193-19198.
|
[7] |
Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., et al. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52, 855-863.
doi: 10.1007/s11434-007-0145-9
|
[8] |
Kosten, J. (2016). A classification of the use of research indicators. Scientometrics, 108, 457-464.
pmid: 27390388
|
[9] |
Kutlača, D., Babić, D., Živković, L., et al. (2015). Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output. Scientometrics, 102, 247-265.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y
|
[10] |
Okubo, Y. (1997). “Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/1, OECDPublishing.
|
[11] |
Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77-90.
pmid: 10187248
|
[12] |
Prathap, G. (2011). Quasity, when quantity has a quality all of its own—Toward a theory of performance. Scientometrics, 88, 555-562.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-011-0401-2
|
[13] |
Russell, J., & Rousseau, R. (2009). “Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation,” Science and Technology Policy - Volume II, UNESCO, 42-64.
|
[14] |
Sahel, J. (2011). Quality versus quantity: Assessing individual research performance. Scienve and. Translational Medicine, 3, 84cm13.
|
[15] |
Shirabe, M. (2019). Measurement of research capacity using disciplinary agglomeration indicators: National university “rankings” in Japan. In Proceedings of the 17th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference, 316-321.
|
[16] |
Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics, 13, 239-259.
doi: 10.1007/BF02019961
|
[17] |
Wilsdon, J. (2015) The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, Sage Publications.
|
[18] |
Yokogawa, T., Nishino, J., & Mizuno, Y. (1995). Macroscopic understanding of the situations in GO. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 31-32.
|
[19] |
Ye, F.Y., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Probing the h-core: An investigation of the tail—core ratio for rank distributions. Scientometrics, 84, 431-439.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0099-6
|