Peiling Wang1, Sukjin You2, Rath Manasa1, Dietmar Wolfram2
| Baker, M. (2016). Statisticians issue warning over misuse of P values. Nature, 531(7593), 151.
Bartholomew, R.E. (2014). Science for sale:The rise of predatory journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 107(10), 384-385.
Björk, B.C., & Solomon, D. (2013). The publishing delay in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 914-923.
Bohannon, J. (2013). Who's afraid of peer review? Science, 342(6154), 60-65.
Bornmann, L., Wolf, M., & Daniel, H.D. (2012). Closed versus open reviewing of journal manuscripts:How far do comments differ in language use? Scientometrics, 91, 843-856.
Council of the European Union. (2016). Outcome of the council meeting, 3470th council meeting:Competitiveness (internal market, industry, research and space), Brussels, 26 and 27 May 2016. Retrieved on July 16, 2016, from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/compet/2016/05/st09357_en16_pdf/.
Enserink, M. (2016). In dramatic statement, European leaders call for‘immediate’open access to all scientific papers by 2020. Science, News, May 27, 2016. Retrieved on July 16, 2016, from http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/05/dramatic-statement-european-leaders-call-immediate-open-access-all-scientific-papers/.
Groves, T. (2010). Is open peer review the fairest system? Yes. BMJ, 341, c6424.
Himmelstein, D. (2015). Publication delays at PLOS and 3,475 other journals. Satoshi Village. Retrieved on April 16, 2016, from http://blog.dhimmel.com/plos-and-publishing-delays/.
Hunter, J. (2012). Post-publication peer review:Opening up scientific conversation. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 63.
Khan, K. (2010). Is open peer review the fairest system? No. BMJ, 341, c6425.
Kriegeskorte, N., Walther, A., & Deca, D. (2012). An emerging consensus for open evaluation:18 visions for the future of scientific publishing. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 6, 94.
Laakso, M., & Björk, B.C. (2012). Anatomy of open access publishing:A study of longitudinal development and internal structure. BMC Medicine, 10, 124.
Lee, C.J., Sugimoto, C.R., Zhang, G., & Cronin, B. (2013). Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(1), 2-17.
McCook, A. (2006). Is peer review broken? Submissions are up, reviewers are overtaxed, and authors are lodging complaint after complaint about the process at top-tier journals. What's wrong with peer review? The Scientist, 20(2), 26-35.
McNutt, R.A., Evans, A.T., Fletcher, R.H., & Fletcher, S.W. (1990). The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review. A randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263(10), 1371-1376.
Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Jamali, H.R., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., Allard, S., & Levine, K. (2015). Peer review:Still king in the digital age. Learned Publishing, 28, 15-21.
Pöschl, U., & Koop, T. (2008). Interactive open access publishing and collaborative peer review for improved scientific communication and quality assurance. Information Services & User, 28, 105-107.
Rennie, D. (2016). Make peer review scientific. Nature, 535 (July 7), 31-33.
Smith, R. (2006). Peer review:A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178-182.
Soergel, D., Saunders, A., & McCallum, A. (2013). Open scholarship and peer review:A time for experimentation. Retrieved on April 17, 2016, from http://tinyurl.com/h3jbkdz/.
Sumner, T., & Shum, S.B. (1996). Open peer review & argumentation:Loosening the paper chains on journals. Retrieved on July 17, 2016, from https://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue5/jime/.
Taylor & Francis Group. (2015). Peer review in 2015:A global view. Retrieved on July 17, 2016, from http://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Peer-Review-2015-white-paper.pdf/.
van Rooyen, S., Delamothe, T., & Evans, S.J.W. (2010). Effect on peer review of telling reviewers that their signed reviews might be posted on the Web:Randomised controlled trial. BMJ, 341, c5729.
van Rooyen, S., Godlee, F., Evans, S., Black, N., & Smith, R. (1999). Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers' recommendations:A randomised trial. British Medical Journal, 318(7175), 23-27.
Wang, P., Rath, R., Deike, M., & Wu, Q. (2016). Open post publication peer review:An innovation in scientific publishing. Retrieved on July 17, 2016, from https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/89432.
Walsh, E., Rooney, M., Appleby, L., & Wilkinson, G. (2000). Open peer review:A randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176(1), 47-51.
Whither Science Publishing. (2012). As we stand on the brink of a new scientific age, how researchers should best communicate their findings and innovations is hotly debated in the publishing trenches. The Scientist, August 1. Retrieved on July 17, 2016, from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/32378/title/Whither-Science-Publishing/.
Woosen, P. (2015). Journal publishers rethink a research mainstay:Peer review. The Chronicle of Higher Education, October 11. Retrieved on July 17, 2016, from http://www.chronicle.com/article/Academic-Publishing-Toward-a/236526.
Zielinska, E. (2013). Open-review journal launched. The Scientist, February 13. Retrieved on July 17, 2016, from http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/34367/title/Open-Review-Journal-Launched/.
|||Jiao Li, Si Zheng, Hongyu Kang, Zhen Hou & Qing Qian. Identifying Scientific Project-generated Data Citation from Full-text Articles: An Investigation of TCGA Data Citation [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2016, 1(2): 32-44.|
|||Xiaolin ZHANG, Xiwen LIU, Lin LI, Yan ZENG, Li-Ping KU. Defining an open access resource strategy for research libraries: Part Ⅲ—The strategies and practices of National Science Library [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2012, 5(3): 1-11.|
|||Xiaolin ZHANG, Yan ZENG, Lin LI & Xiwen LIU. Defining an open access resource strategy for research libraries: Part II—Challenges and responses [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2012, 5(2): 1-17.|
|||Xiaolin ZHANG, Lin LI, Xiwen LIU & Yan ZENG . Defining an open access resource strategy for research libraries: Part I—The coming main streamlization of open access resources? [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2011, 4(3/4): 1-11.|
|||SHEN Kun & HUANG Shuiqing. An analysis on domestic users' awareness towards Open Access resources: A case study of university users in Nanjing [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2009, 2(2): 57-70.|