Journal of Data and Information Science ›› 2023, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1): 72-89.doi: 10.2478/jdis-2023-0001
• Research Paper • Previous Articles
Olesya Mryglod1,†(), Serhii Nazarovets2, Serhiy Kozmenko3
Received:
2022-07-07
Revised:
2022-10-06
Accepted:
2022-11-16
Online:
2023-02-20
Published:
2023-02-22
Contact:
†Olesya Mryglod (Email:
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://manu47.magtech.com.cn/Jwk3_jdis/EN/10.2478/jdis-2023-0001
http://manu47.magtech.com.cn/Jwk3_jdis/EN/Y2023/V8/I1/72
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
(Color online) Annual dynamics of shares of papers classified according to the gender of authors: a single female author (F solo); two or more authors, only females (F coll); two or more authors, at least one female and at least one male (MIX coll); two or more authors, only males (M coll); a single male author (M solo). The time window between 2013 and 2020 is chosen for visualization due to small annual statistics (less than 100 papers per year) before 2013.
Table 1.
Distribution of papers according to authors' gender: a single female author (F solo); two or more authors, only females (F coll); two or more authors, at least one female and at least one male (MIX coll); two or more authors, only males (M coll); a single male author (M solo).
Entire data set | Reshuffled* | Not indexed in Scopus and/or WoS | Indexed in Scopus and/or WoS | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# records | Share | Share | # records | Share | # records | Share | |
All papers | 25933 | - | - | 22683 | - | 3250 | - |
All papers assigned to one of the categories | 17352 | 100% | (13785 records on average) | 15422 | 100% | 1930 | 100% |
F solo | 5871 | 33.8% | 34.8% | 5684 | 36.9% | 187 | 9.7% |
F coll | 3085 | 17.8% | 10.4% | 2841 | 18.4% | 244 | 12.6% |
MIX coll | 4283 | 24.7% | 28.5% | 3236 | 21% | 1047 | 54.3% |
M coll | 816 | 4.7% | 4.1% | 598 | 3.9% | 218 | 11.3% |
M solo | 3297 | 19% | 22.2% | 3063 | 19.8% | 234 | 12.1% |
Table 2.
The numbers of non-alphabetically ordered papers and estimated volume of potentially alphabetized papers (adjusted values) for different data samples.
Number of papers (collaborative only) | Number (%) of papers with definitely non-alphabetical ordering of authors' names | Adjusted number (%) of papers that are potentially alphabetically ordered by intention | |
---|---|---|---|
Entire data sets | 13237 | 6596(49.8%) | 3824 (28.9%) |
Papers marked by gender categories | 8184 | 4057 (49.6%) | 2384 (29.1%) |
Papers indexed in Scopus and/or WoS | 2592 | 1672 (64.5%) | 601 (23.2%) |
Papers NOT indexed in Scopus and/or WoS | 10645 | 4924 (46.3%) | 3223 (30.3%) |
Cross-gender papers | 4283 | 2369 (55.3%) | 1169 (27.3%) |
Solo-gender papers | 3901 | 1688 (43.3%) | 1215 (31.1%) |
[1] |
Aistleitner M., Kapeller J., & Steinerberger S. (2019, December). Citation patterns in economics and beyond. Science in Context, 32(4), 361380. doi: 10.1017/s0269889720000022
doi: 10.1017/s0269889720000022 |
[2] | Aksnes D. W., & Sivertsen G. (2019). A criteria-based assessment of the coverage of scopus and web of science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 4(1), 1-21. |
[3] |
Bayer A., & Rouse C. E. (2016, November). Diversity in the economics profession: A new attack on an old problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(4), 221-242. doi: 10.1257/jep.30.4.221
doi: 10.1257/jep.30.4.221 |
[4] |
Bornmann L., & Marx W. (2020, February). Thomas theorem in research evaluation. Scientometrics, 123(1), 553-555. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03389-6
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03389-6 |
[5] |
Boschini A., & Sjögren A. (2007, April). Is team formation gender neutral? Evidence from coauthorship patterns. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(2), 325-365. doi: 10.1086/510764
doi: 10.1086/510764 |
[6] |
Cainelli G., Maggioni M. A., Uberti T. E., & De Felice A. (2012). Co-authorship and productivity among italian economists. Applied Economics Letters, 19(16), 1609-1613.
doi: 10.1080/13504851.2011.646063 |
[7] |
Cheberkus D., & Nazarovets S. (2019, November). Ukrainian open index maps local citations. Nature, 575(7784), 596596. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03662-6
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03662-6 |
[8] |
Einav L., & Yariv L. (2006, February). What's in a surname? the effects of surname initials on academic success. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 175-188. doi: 10.1257/089533006776526085
doi: 10.1257/089533006776526085 |
[9] |
Farhoomand A., & Drury D. H. (2001). Diversity and scientific progress in the information systems discipline. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 5. doi: 10.17705/1cais.00512
doi: 10.17705/1cais.00512 |
[10] |
Frandsen T. F., & Nicolaisen J. (2010, October). What is in a name? Credit assignment practices in dierent disciplines. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 608-617. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.010 |
[11] |
Gomide J., Kling H., & Figueiredo D. (2017). Name usage pattern in the synonym ambiguity problem in bibliographic data. Scientometrics, 112(2), 747-766.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2410-2 |
[12] |
Holman L., & Morandin C. (2019, April). Researchers collaborate with same-gendered colleagues more often than expected across the life sciences. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0216128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216128
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216128 |
[13] |
Huang J., Gates A. J., Sinatra R., & Barabasi A.-L. (2020, February). Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientic careers across countries and disciplines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(9), 4609-4616. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914221117
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1914221117 |
[14] |
Kim J., Kim J., & Owen-Smith J. (2021). Ethnicity-based name partitioning for author name disambiguation using supervised machine learning. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 979-994.
doi: 10.1002/asi.24459 pmid: 34414251 |
[15] |
Kuld L., & O'Hagan J. (2017, November). Rise of multi-authored papers in economics: Demise of the `lone star' and why? Scientometrics, 114(3), 1207-1225. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2588-3
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2588-3 |
[16] |
Kwiek M., & Roszka W. (2021, August). Gender-based homophily in research: A large-scale study of man-woman collaboration. Journal of Informetrics, 15(3), 101171. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101171
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101171 |
[17] |
Larivière V., Ni C., Gingras Y., Cronin B., & Sugimoto C. R. (2013, December). Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science. Nature, 504(7479), 211-213. doi: 10.1038/504211a
doi: 10.1038/504211a |
[18] |
Levitt J. M., & Thelwall M. (2013, July). Alphabetization and the skewing of first authorship towards last names early in the alphabet. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 575-582. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.002
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.002 |
[19] |
Liao C. H. (2010, November). How to improve research quality? examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 86(3), 747-761. doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2
doi: 10.1007/s11192-010-0309-2 |
[20] |
Liu J. W., Song Y. L., & Yang S. (2020, July). Gender disparities in the field of economics. Scientometrics, 125(2), 1477-1498. doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03627-x
doi: 10.1007/s11192-020-03627-x |
[21] |
Maddi A., & Gingras Y. (2021, February). Gender diversity in research teams and citation impact in economics and management. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(5), 1381-1404. doi: 10.1111/joes.12420
doi: 10.1111/joes.12420 |
[22] | Mryglod O. (2012). Ukrainian scientific academic periodicals: The level of visibility. Science of Ukraine in the Global Information Space (6), 36-44. |
[23] |
Mryglod O., Nazarovets S., & Kozmenko S. (2021, June). Universal and specific features of ukrainian economic research: publication analysis based on crossref data. Scientometrics, 126(9), 81878203. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04079-7
doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-04079-7 |
[24] |
Müller M.-C., Reitz F., & Roy N. (2017). Data sets for author name disambiguation: an empirical analysis and a new resource. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1467-1500.
doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2363-5 |
[25] |
Nicola A. D., & D'Agostino G. (2021, March). Assessment of gender divide in scientific communities. Scientometrics, 126(5), 3807-3840. doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03885-3
doi: 10.1007/s11192-021-03885-3 |
[26] | Reynolds A., & Lewis D. (2017). Teams solve problems faster when they're more cognitively diverse. https://hbr.org/2017/03/teams-solve-problems-faster-when-theyre-more-cognitively-diverse. ([On-line; accessed 05-July-2022]) |
[27] |
Sasvári P., Nemeslaki A., & Duma L. (2019, March). Exploring the influence of scientific journal ranking on publication performance in the hungarian social sciences: the case of law and economics. Scientometrics, 119(2), 595-616. doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03081-4
doi: 10.1007/s11192-019-03081-4 |
[28] |
Schläpfer F. (2010, June). How much does journal reputation tell us about the academic interest and relevance of economic research? empirical analysis and implications for environmental economic research. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 19(2), 140-145. doi: 10.14512/gaia.19.2.13
doi: 10.14512/gaia.19.2.13 |
[29] |
Thelwall M., Bailey C., Tobin C., & Bradshaw N.-A. (2019, February). Gender differences in research areas, methods and topics: Can people and thing orientations explain the results? Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 149-169. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.002
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2018.12.002 |
[30] |
Thelwall M., & Mas-Bleda A. (2020, August). A gender equality paradox in academic publishing: Countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored journal articles have larger first-author gender disparities between fields. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1260-1282. doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00050
doi: 10.1162/qss_a_00050 |
[31] | Treeratpituk P., & Giles C. L. (2012). Name-ethnicity classification and ethnicity-sensitive name matching. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence 26: 1141-1147. |
[32] |
Truc A., Claveau F., & Santerre O. (2021, January). Economic methodology: a bibliometric perspective. Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(1), 67-78. doi: 10.1080/1350178x.2020.1868774
doi: 10.1080/1350178x.2020.1868774 |
[33] |
Vaio G. D., & Weisdorf J. L. (2009, March). Ranking economic history journals: a citation-based impact-adjusted analysis. Cliometrica, 4(1), 1-17. doi: 10.1007/s11698-009-0039-y
doi: 10.1007/s11698-009-0039-y |
[34] |
Waltman L. (2012, October). An empirical analysis of the use of alphabetical authorship in scientific publishing. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 700-711. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008
doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2012.07.008 |
[35] |
Wei G. Y. (2018, March). A bibliometric analysis of the top five economics journals during 2012-2016. Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(1), 25-59. doi: 10.1111/joes.12260
doi: 10.1111/joes.12260 |
[36] |
West J. D., Jacquet J., King M. M., Correll S. J., & Bergstrom C. T. (2013, July). The role of gender in scholarly authorship. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e66212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 |
[37] |
Wohlrabe K., & Bornmann L. (2022, March). Alphabetized co-authorship in economics reconsidered. Scientometrics, 127(5), 2173-2193. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04322-9
doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04322-9 |
[38] |
Zhao S. X., Yu S., Tan A. M., Xu X., & Yu H. Y. (2016, May). Global pattern of science funding in economics. Scientometrics, 109(1), 463-479. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1961-y
doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1961-y |
[1] | Tomáš Chudlarský, Jan Dvořák. Can Crossref Citations Replace Web of Science for Research Evaluation? The Share of Open Citations [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2020, 5(4): 35-42. |
[2] | Yating LI & Bin ZHANG. A comparative study on institutional collaboration characteristics in EM and LIS in China [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2015, 7(4): 62-77. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||