[1] |
2015 Editors’, choice. (2015). Nature, 528(7583), 490-491. doi: 10.1038/528490a
doi: 10.1038/528490a
|
[2] |
2016 Editors’, choice. (2016). Nature, 540(7634), 536-537. doi: 10.1038/540536a
doi: 10.1038/540536a
|
[3] |
Antelman, K. (2004). Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact? 2004, 65(5), 11. doi: 10.5860/crl.65.5.372
doi: 10.5860/crl.65.5.372
|
[4] |
Banks, M.G. (2006). An extension of the Hirsch index: Indexing scientific topics and compounds. Scientometrics, 69(1), 161-168. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5
doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0146-5
|
[5] |
Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., & Jordan, M.I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation.[J]. Mach. Learn. Res., 3(2003), 993-1022.
|
[6] |
Cong, L., Ran, F.A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., … Zhang, F. (2013). Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems. Science, 339(6121), 819. doi: 10.1126/science.1231143
doi: 10.1126/science.1231143
pmid: 23287718
|
[7] |
Craig, I.D., Plume, A.M., McVeigh, M.E., Pringle, J., & Amin, M. (2007). Do open access articles have greater citation impact?: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(3), 239-248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2007.04.001
|
[8] |
Davis, P.M. (2011). Open access, readership, citations: a randomized controlled trial of scientific journal publishing. The FASEB Journal, 25(7), 2129-2134. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988
doi: 10.1096/fj.11-183988
|
[9] |
Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles. PLOS Biology, 4(5), e157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157
|
[10] |
Frandsen, T.F. (2009). The effects of open access on un-published documents: A case study of economics working papers. Journal of Informetrics, 3(2), 124-133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.002
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.12.002
|
[11] |
Genetic Microsurgery for the Masses. (2013). Science, 342(6165), 1434. doi: 10.1126/science.342.6165.1434-a
doi: 10.1126/science.342.6165.1434-a
|
[12] |
Jinek, M., Chylinski, K., Fonfara, I., Hauer, M., Doudna, J.A., & Charpentier, E. (2012). A Programmable Dual-RNA-Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity. Science, 337(6096), 816. doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
|
[13] |
Lawrence, S. (2001). Free online availability substantially increases a paper’s impact. Nature, 411(6837), 521-521. doi: 10.1038/35079151
doi: 10.1038/35079151
|
[14] |
Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K.M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J.E., … Church, G.M. (2013). RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9. Science, 339(6121), 823. doi: 10.1126/science.1232033
doi: 10.1126/science.1232033
|
[15] |
McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., … Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. eLife, 5, e16800. doi: 10.7554/eLife.16800
doi: 10.7554/eLife.16800
|
[16] |
Nature. (2014). Nature promotes read-only sharing by subscribers. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/news/nature-makes-all-articles-free-to-view-1.16460
|
[17] |
Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963-1972. doi: 10.1002/asi.20898
doi: 10.1002/asi.20898
|
[18] |
Pennisi, E., Culotta, E., Kupferschmidt, K., Cho, A., Voosen, P., & Couzin-Frankel, J. (2019). Runners-up. Science, 366(6472), 1436. doi: 10.1126/science.366.6472.1436
doi: 10.1126/science.366.6472.1436
|
[19] |
Robots, hominins and superconductors: 10 remarkable papers from 2019. (2019). Nature, 576(7787), 394-396. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03834-4
doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03834-4
|
[20] |
Runners-up. (2015). Science, 350(6267), 1458. doi: 10.1126/science.350.6267.1458
doi: 10.1126/science.350.6267.1458
|
[21] |
Small, H. (2006). Tracking and predicting growth areas in science. Scientometrics, 68(3), 595-610. doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y
doi: 10.1007/s11192-006-0132-y
|
[22] |
Sotudeh, H. (2019). Does open access citation advantage depend on paper topics? Journal of Information Science, 1-14. doi: 10.1177/0165551519865489
doi: 10.1177/0165551519865489
|
[23] |
Stokstad, E., Pennisi, E., Kaiser, J., Cohen, J., Couzin-Frankel, J., Voosen, P., … Cho, A. (2017). The runners up. Science, 358(6370), 1522. doi: 10.1126/science.358.6370.1522
doi: 10.1126/science.358.6370.1522
pmid: 29269457
|
[24] |
Travis, J. (2015). Making the cut. Science, 350(6267), 1456. doi: 10.1126/science.350.6267.1456
doi: 10.1126/science.350.6267.1456
pmid: 26680172
|
[25] |
UNESCO. Open Science. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/science-sustainable-future/open-science/
|
[26] |
Wang, X.W., Liu, C., Mao, W.L., & Fang, Z.C. (2015). The open access advantage considering citation, article usage and social media attention. Scientometrics, 103(2), 555-564. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1547-0
|
[27] |
Ye, F.Y. (2013). Measuring hot topics in sciences. Current Science, 104(2), 160-160.
|