What Does Information Science Offer for Data Science Research?: A Review of Data and Information Ethics Literature

doi:10.2478/jdis-2022-0018

Abstract

Abstract:

This paper reviews literature pertaining to the development of data science as a discipline, current issues with data bias and ethics, and the role that the discipline of information science may play in addressing these concerns. Information science research and researchers have much to offer for data science, owing to their background as transdisciplinary scholars who apply human-centered and social-behavioral perspectives to issues within natural science disciplines. Information science researchers have already contributed to a humanistic approach to data ethics within the literature and an emphasis on data science within information schools all but ensures that this literature will continue to grow in coming decades. This review article serves as a reference for the history, current progress, and potential future directions of data ethics research within the corpus of information science literature.

Key words: Data science, Library and information science, Data ethics, Data bias, Education

Brady Lund , and Ting Wang .(2022). What Does Information Science Offer for Data Science Research?: A Review of Data and Information Ethics Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 7(4), 16-38. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2022-0018

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: http://manu47.magtech.com.cn/Jwk3_jdis/EN/10.2478/jdis-2022-0018

http://manu47.magtech.com.cn/Jwk3_jdis/EN/Y2022/V7/I4/16

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Figures/Tables 2

References 181

[1]	Acute Market Reports. (2020). Global big data analytics market size, market share, application analysis, regional outlook, growth trends, key players, competitive strategies and forecasts, 2019 to 2027. Retrieved from https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4992328/
[2]	Adam, R. (1991). Laws for the lawless: Ethics in (information) science. Journal of Information Science, 17, 357-372. doi: 10.1177/016555159101700603
[3]	Ajibade, P., & Mutula, S.M. (2020). Big data research outputs in the library and information science. African Journal of Libraries, Archives, and Information Science, 30(1), 49-60.
[4]	Andres, M.C. (2016). Ethical differences: A literature review of the ethics of competitive intelligence for the LIS professional. Journal of Library and Information Sciences, 4(1), 1-15.
[5]	Antell, K., Bales Foote, J., Turner, J., & Shults, B. (2014). Dealing with data: Science librarians' participation in data management at Association of Research Libraries institutions. College and Research Libraries, 75(4), 557-574. doi: 10.5860/crl.75.4.557
[6]	Aragon, C., Hutto, C., Echenique, A., Fiore-Gartland, B., Huang, Y., Kim, J., …, & Bayer, J. (2016). Developing a research agenda for human-centered data science. ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion, 19, 529-535.
[7]	Ball, G.H., & Hall, D.J. (1967). A clustering technique for summarizing multivariate data. Behavioral Science, 12(2), 153-155. pmid: 6030099
[8]	Ballantyne, A. (2020). How should we think about clinical data ownership? Journal of Medical Ethics, 46, 289-294. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105340 pmid: 31911499
[9]	Banterle, F. (2019). Data ownership in the data economy:A European dilemma. In Synodinou, T.E., Jougleux, P., Markou, C., & Prastitou, T. (eds.), EU Internet law in the digital era. New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25579-4_9
[10]	Bar-Ilan, J. (2007a). Google bombing from a time perspective. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 910-938. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00356.x doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00356.x
[11]	Bar-Ilan, J. (2007b). Manipulating search engine algorithms: The case of Google. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 5(2/3), 155-166. doi: 10.1108/14779960710837623
[12]	Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21^st century: A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1-52. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2007.11.001
[13]	Barocas, S., & Boyd, B. (2017). Computing ethics: Engaging the ethics of data science in practice. Communications of the ACM, 60(11), 23-25.
[14]	Bates, M.J. (1999). The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1043-1050. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12%3C1043::AID-ASI1%3E3.0.CO;2-X doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1043::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-X
[15]	Bates, M.J. (2005). Information and knowledge: An evolutionary framework for information science. Information Research, 10(4), paper 239.
[16]	Bates, M.J. (2015). The information professions: Knowledge, memory, heritage. Information Research, 20(1), paper 655. http://InformationR.net/ir/20-1/paper655.html
[17]	Bath, P.A., Craigs, C., Maheswaran, R., Raymond, J., & Willett, P. (2005). Use of graph thoery to identify patterns of deprivation and high morbidity and mortality in public health data sets. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(6), 630-641. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1714
[18]	Batts, N.C. (1966). Data analysis of science monograph order/cataloging forms. Special Libraries, 57, 583-586.
[19]	Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020). “The dearest of our possessions”: Applying Floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behavior and information literacy. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1030-1043. doi: 10.1002/asi.24367
[20]	Belkin, N.J. (1980). Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 5, 133-143.
[21]	Bell, A.G. (1881). The production of sound by radiant energy. Science, 48, 242-253. doi: 10.1126/science.48.1236.242
[22]	Berman, F., Rutenbar, R., Hailpern, B., Christensen, H. Davidson, S., Estrin, D., …, Szalay, A.S. (2018). Realizing the potential of data science. Communications of the ACM, 61(4), 67-72.
[23]	Blum, A., Hopcroft, J., & Kannan, R. (2020). Foundations of data sccience. Cambridge, UK: University Printing House.
[24]	Boole, G. (1847). The mathematical analysis of logic. Cambridge, MA: MacMillan, Barclay, and MacMillan.
[25]	Borko, H. (1968). Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19(1), 3-5. doi: 10.1002/asi.5090190103
[26]	Bozdag, E. (2013). Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(3), 209-227. doi: 10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
[27]	Brase, J., & Farquhar, A. (2011). Access to research data. D-Lib Magazine, 17(1/2). https://doi.org/10.1045/january2011-brase
[28]	Brennan, P.F., Chiang, M.F., & Ohno-Machado, L. (2018). Biomedical informatics and data science: Evolving fields with significant overlap. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(1), 2-3. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx146 pmid: 29267964
[29]	Butler, P. (1951). Librarianship as a profession. The Library Quarterly, 21(4), 235-247. https://doi.org/10.1086/617815 doi: 10.1086/617815
[30]	Cao, L. (2017). Data science: Challenges and directions. Communications of the ACM, 60(8), 59-68. doi: 10.1145/3015456
[31]	Carlin, A.P. (2003). Disciplinary debates and bases of interdisciplinary studies: The place of research ethics in library and information science. Library and Information Science Research, 25, 3-18. doi: 10.1016/S0740-8188(02)00163-9
[32]	Cassileth, B.R., Zupkis, R.V., Sutton-Smith, K., & March, V. (1980). Informed consent: Why are its goals imperfectly realized? New England Journal of Medicine, 302, 896-900. pmid: 7360175
[33]	Chen, C., Haddad, D., Selsky, J., Hoffman, J.E., Kravitz, R.L., Estrin, D.E., & Sim, I. (2012). Making sense of mobile health data: An open architecture to improve individual- and population-level health. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(4), pe112-e112.
[34]	Chen, F., Bollen, K.A., Paxton, P., Curran, P.J., & Kirby, J.B. (2001). Improper solutions in structural equation models: Causes, consequences, and strategies. Sociological Methods and Research, 29(4), 468-508. doi: 10.1177/0049124101029004003
[35]	Chohdary, N.I., Asghar, M.B., & Al Shaheer, M.A. (2021). Predicting LIS scholarly research directions in the era of data science. Library Philosophy and Practice, article 6328. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6328
[36]	Christopherson, L., Scott, E., Mandal, A., & Baldin, I. (2020). Toward a data lifecycle model for NSF large facilities. Proceedings of Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing Conference, 2020. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1145/3311790.3396636
[37]	Cleveland, W.S. (2007). Data science: An action plan for expanding the technical areas of the field of statistics. International Statistical Review, 69(1), 21-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2001.tb00477.x
[38]	Cole., N.S. (1981). Bias in testing. American Psychologist, 36(10), 1067-1077. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1067
[39]	Coleman, C.N. (2020). Managing bias when library collections become data. International Journal of Librarianship, 5(1), 8-19. doi: 10.23974/ijol.2020.vol5.1.162
[40]	Conger, L.D. (1976). Data reference work with machine readable data files in the social sciences. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 2, 60-65.
[41]	Coombs, C.H. (1964). A theory of data. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
[42]	Cooke, L. (2018). Privacy, libraries and the era of big data. IFLA Journal, 44(3), 167-169. doi: 10.1177/0340035218789601
[43]	Corbett, M., Deardorff, A., & Kovar-Gough, I. (2014). Emerging data management roles for health librarians in electronic medical records. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 35, 55-59. doi: 10.5596/c14-022
[44]	Cox, A., & Pinfield, S. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Current activities and future priorities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 46(4), 299-316. doi: 10.1177/0961000613492542
[45]	Cox, A., & Tam, W. (2018). A critical analysis of lifecycle models of the research process and research data management. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70(2), 142-157. doi: 10.1108/AJIM-11-2017-0251
[46]	Cuadra, C.A. (1982). A library and information science research agenda for the 1980s: Final Report. Santa Monica, CA: Cuadra Associates.
[47]	Dattalo, P. (2010). Ethical dilemmas in sampling. Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 7(1), 12-23.
[48]	Dhar, V. (2013). Data science and prediction. Communications of the ACM, 56(12), 64-73.
[49]	Dolly, J.P., & Tillman, M.H. (1974). An overview of research artifacts supposedly causing data bias. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1974. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED101009.pdf
[50]	Dube-Rioux, L., & Russo, J.E. (1988). An availability bias in professional judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1(4), 223-237. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960010403
[51]	Eastman, C.M., & Jansen, B.J. (2003). Coverage, relevance, and ranking: The impact of query operators on web search engine results. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(4), 383-411. doi: 10.1145/944012.944015
[52]	Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (1990). Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation, and information science. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
[53]	Fairfield, J., & Shtein, H. (2014). Big data, big problems: Emerging issues in the ethics of data science in journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 29(1), 38-51. doi: 10.1080/08900523.2014.863126
[54]	Floridi, L. (2014). Open data, data protection, and group privacy. Philosophy and Technology, 27, 1-3. doi: 10.1007/s13347-014-0157-8
[55]	Floridi, L. (2021). Ethics, governance, and policies in artificial intelligence. London, UK: Springer.
[56]	Furner, J. (2007). Dewey deracialized: A critical race-theoretic perspective. Knowledge Organization, 34(3), 144-168. doi: 10.5771/0943-7444-2007-3-144
[57]	Furner, J. (2015). Information science is neither. Library Trends, 63(3), 362-377. doi: 10.1353/lib.2015.0009
[58]	Fyffe, R. (2015). The value of information: Normativity, epistemology, and library and information science in Luciano Floridi. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(2), 267-286. doi: 10.1353/pla.2015.0020
[59]	Gao, R., & Shah, C. (2020a). Toward creating a fairer ranking in search enginer results. Information Processing and Management, 57(1), article 102138.
[60]	Gao, R., & Shah, C. (2020b). Counteracting bias and increasing fairness in search and recommender systems. ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, 14, 745-747.
[61]	Garfield, E., Sher, I.H., & Torpie, R.J. (1964). The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for Scientific Information.
[62]	Griffiths, J., & King, D.W. (1985). New directions in library and information science education. Rockville, MD: King Research Inc.
[63]	Gummesson, E. (2003). All research is interpretive! Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 18(6/7), 482-492. doi: 10.1108/08858620310492365
[64]	Hahn, S., Puffer, S., Torgerson, D.J., & Watson, J. (2005). Methodological bias in cluster randomized trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5, article 10.
[65]	Hajian, S., Bonchi, F., & Castillo, C. (2016). Algorithmic bias: From discrimination discovery to fairness-aware data mining. Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 22, 2125-2126.
[66]	Hand, D.J. (2018). Aspects of data ethics in a changing world: Where are we now?. Big data, 6(3), 176-190. doi: 10.1089/big.2018.0083
[67]	Harmeyer, D. (1995). Potential collection development bias: Some evidence on a controversial topic in California. College and Research Libraries, 56, 101-111. doi: 10.5860/crl_56_02_101
[68]	Hartley, R.V. (1928). Transmission of information. Bell System Technical Journal, July 1928, 535.
[69]	Haussler, D. (1988). Quantifying inductive bias: AI learning algorithms and Valiant's learning framework. Artificial Intelligence, 36(2), 177-221. doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(88)90002-1
[70]	Hoffmann, A.L. (2019). Where fairness fails: On data, algorithms, and the limits of antidiscrimination discourse. Information, Communication, and Society, 22(7), 900-915. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573912
[71]	Hoffmann, A.L., Wolf, C.T., Roberts, S.T., & Wood, S. (2018). Beyond fairness, accountability, and transparency in the ethics of algorithms: Contributions and perspectives from LIS. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 81, 695-696.
[72]	Horst, P. (1965). Factor analysis of data matrices. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
[73]	Jackson, B. (2018). The changing research data landscape and the experiences of ethics review board chairs. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(5), 603-612. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2018.07.001
[74]	Janeway, R.C. (1944). Technique of measuring student use of the university library through circulation records (doctoral dissertation). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.
[75]	Jansen, B.J., & Schuster, S. (2011). Bidding on the buying funnel for sponsored search and keyword advertising. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10660-012-9087-7
[76]	Järvinen, T.L.N., Sihvonen, R., Bhandari, M., Sprague, S., Malmivaara, A., Paavola, M., Schünemann, H.J., & Guyatt, G.H. (2014). Blinded interpretation of study results can feasibly and effectively diminish interpretation bias. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(7), 769-772. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.11.011 pmid: 24560088
[77]	Javed, H., Bagh, T., & Razzaq, S. (2017). Herding effects, over confidence, availability bias and representativeness as behavioral determinants of perceived investment performance: An empirical evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange. Journal of Global Economics, 6(1), 1-13.
[78]	Jones, K.M.L. (2019). “Just because you can doesn't mean you should”: Practitioner perceptions of learning analytics ethics. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 19(3), 407-428. doi: 10.1353/pla.2019.0025
[79]	Jones, K.M.L., Asher, A., Goben, A., Perry, M.R., Salo, D., Briney, K.A., & Robertshaw, M.B. (2020). “We're being tracked at all times”: Student perspectives of their privacy in relation to learning analytics in higher education. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1044-1059. doi: 10.1002/asi.24358
[80]	Jones, K.M.L., & Salo, D. (2018). Learning analytics and the academic library: Professional ethics commitments at a crossroads. College and Research Libraries, 79(3), 304-323. doi: 10.5860/crl.79.3.304
[81]	Kerr, K.A., Norris, T., & Stockdale, R. (2008). The strategic management of data quality in healthcare. Health Informatics Journal, 14(4), 259-266. doi: 10.1177/1460458208096555 pmid: 19008276
[82]	Kilgour, F.G. (1969). The economic goal of library automation. College & Research Libraries, 30(4), 307-311.
[83]	Kinksman, B. (1957). Proper and improper use of statistics in geophysics. Tellus, 9(3), 408-418. doi: 10.3402/tellusa.v9i3.9099
[84]	Kiviet, J.F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficacy of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 53-78. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)01643-E
[85]	Klein, L.R. (1953). A textbook of econometrics. White Plains, NY: Row, Peterson, and Company.
[86]	Koene, A. (2017) Algorithmic bias: Addressing growing concerns. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, June 2017, 31-32.
[87]	Koltay, T. (2017). Data literacy for researchers and data librarians. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 49(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000615616450 doi: 10.1177/0961000615616450
[88]	Kostrewski, B.J., & Oppenheim, C. (1979). Ethics in information science. Journal of Information Science, 1(5), 277-283. doi: 10.1177/016555157900100505
[89]	Kuiler, E.W., & McNeely, C.L. (2020). Knowledge formulation in the health domain: A semiotics-powered approach to data analytics and democratization. In Batarseh, F.A., & Yang, R., Data democracy: At the nexus of artificial intelligence, software development, and knowledge engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
[90]	Laskowski, C. (2021). Structuring better services for unstructured data: Academic libraries are key to an ethical research data future with big data. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(4), 102335.
[91]	Liang, F., Yu, W., An, D., Yang, Q., Fu, X., & Zhao, W. (2018). A survey on big data market: Pricing, trading, and protection. IEEE Access, 6, 15132-15154. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2806881
[92]	Lund, B.D. (2022). The Art of (Data) Storytelling: Hip Hop Innovation and Bringing a Social Justice Mindset to Data Science and Visualization. The International Journal of Information, Diversity, & Inclusion (IJIDI), 6(1/2), 31-41.
[93]	Lund, B.D., Wang, T., Shamsi, A., Abdullahi, J., Awojobi, E.A., Borgohain, D.J., …, & Yusuf, A.O. (2021). Barriers to scholarly publishing among library and information science researchers: International perspectives. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211052522
[94]	Lynn, P., & Jowell, R. (1996). How might opinion polls be improved?: The case for probability sampling. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 159(1), 21-28. doi: 10.2307/2983465
[95]	Ma, J., & Lund, B.D. (2020). The evolution of LIS research topics and methods from 2006 to 2018: A content analysis. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e241.
[96]	Ma, J., & Lund, B.D. (2021). The evolution and shift of research topics and methods in library and information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1059-1074. doi: 10.1002/asi.24474
[97]	Mamede, S., van Gog, T., van den Berge, K., Rikers, R.M.J., van Saase, J.L., van Guldener, C., & Schmidt, H.G. (2010). Effect of availability bias and reflective reasoning on diagnostic accuracy among internal medicine residents. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(11), 1198-1203.
[98]	Marchionini, G. (2016). Information science roles in the emerging field of data science. Journal of Data and Information Science, 1(2), 1-6.
[99]	Mark, M.M., Eyssell, K.M., & Campbell, B. (1999). The ethics of data collection and analysis. New Directions for Evaluation, 82, 47-56.
[100]	Martinez-Mesa, J., Gonzalez-Chica, D.A., Duquia, R.P., Bonamigo, R.R., & Bastos, J.L. (2016). Sampling: How to select participants in my research study? Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, 91(3), 326-330. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20165254
[101]	Millsap, R.E., & Everson, H.T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17(4), 297-334. doi: 10.1177/014662169301700401
[102]	Mittelstadt, B.D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data and Society, July-December 2016, 1-21.
[103]	Mittelstadt, B.D., & Floridi, L. (2015). The ethics of big data: Current and foreseeable issues in biomedical contexts. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22, 303-341. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9652-2
[104]	Nicholson, N.N., & Bartlett, E. (1962). Who uses university libraries? College and Research Libraries, 23(3), 217-259. doi: 10.5860/crl_23_03_217
[105]	Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as conxtual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79, 119-158.
[106]	Noble, S.U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York, NY: New York University Press.
[107]	Ntoutsi, E., Fafalios, P., Gadiraju, U., Iosifidis, V., Nejdl, W., Vidal, M., …, & Staab, S. (2020). Bias in data-driven artificial intelligence systems: An introductory survey. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 10, paper e1356. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1356
[108]	Ortiz-Repiso, V., Greenberg, J., & Calzada-Prado, J. (2018). A cross-institutional analysis of data-related curricula in information science programs. Journal of Information Science, 44(6), 768-784. doi: 10.1177/0165551517748149
[109]	Osborne, N.K.P., Woods, S., Kieser, J., & Zajac, R. (2014). Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons? Science and Justice, 54(4), 267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.12.005 pmid: 25002044
[110]	Paré, G., Trudel, M.C., Jaana, M., & Kitsiou, S. (2015). Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews. Information and Management, 52(2), 183-199. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
[111]	Pather, S., & Gomez, R. (2010). Public access ICT: A south-south comparative analysis of libraries, telecentres and cybercafes in South Africa and Brazil. AMCIS 2010 Proceedings, article 526. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/526
[112]	Pederson, E.R., Neighbors, C., Tidwell, J., & Lostutter, T.W. (2011). Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological consent forms? Ethics and Behavior, 21(4), 332-350. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2011.585601
[113]	Pinfield, S., Cox, A.M., & Smith, J. (2014). Research data management and libraries: Relationships, activities, drivers and influencers. PLoS One, 9(12), e114734.
[114]	Poole, A.H. (2021). Leading the way: A new model for data science education. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 525-531. doi: 10.1002/pra2.491
[115]	Pope, A. (1975). Bradford's law and the periodical literature of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26, 207-213. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630260403
[116]	Prado, J.C., & Marzal, M.A. (2013). Incorporting data literacy into information literacy programs: Core competencies and contents. Libri, 63(2), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0010
[117]	Price, W., & Nicholson, I. (2019). Medical AI and contextual bias. Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, 33, 65-116.
[118]	Prindle, S., & Loos, A. (2017). Information ethics and academic libraires: Data privacy in the era of big data. Journal of Information Ethics, 26(2), 22-33.
[119]	Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2013). Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data, 1(1), 51-59. doi: 10.1089/big.2013.1508
[120]	Ranganathan, S.R. (1931). The five laws of library science. London, UK: Edward Goldston, LTD.
[121]	Ray, J.M. (ed.) (2014). Research data management: Practical strategies for information professionals. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.
[122]	Read, M. (2008). Libraries and repositories. New Reivew of Academic Librarianship, 14(1/2), 71-78.
[123]	Richards, N.M., & King, J.H. (2014). Big data ethics. Wake Forest Law Review, 49, 393-432.
[124]	Roberts, S.T. (2016). Commerical content moderation:Digital laborers' dirty work. In Noble, S.U. and Tynes, B. (eds.), The intersectional Internet. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
[125]	Roeschley, A., & Khader, M. (2020). Defining data ethics in library and information science. iConference Proceedings, 2020. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2142/106536
[126]	Rolfe, H. (2017). Inequality, social mobility and the new economy: Introduction. National Institute Economic Review, 240(1), R1-R4.
[127]	Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representation of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163-180. doi: 10.1177/0165551506070706
[128]	Rubel, A. (2014). Libraries, electronic resources, and privacy: The case for positive intellectual freedom. The Library Quarterly, 84(2), 183-208. doi: 10.1086/675331
[129]	Rubel, A., & Jones, K.M.L. (2016). Student privacy in learning analytics: An information ethics perspective. The Information Society, 32(2), 143-159. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2016.1130502
[130]	Rubin, R. (2017). Foundations of library and information science. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
[131]	Rüegg, J., Gries, C., Bond-Lamberty, B., Bowen, G.J., Felzer, B.S., McIntyre, N.E.,... & Weathers, K.C. (2014). Completing the data life cycle: using information management in macrosystems ecology research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12(1), 24-30. doi: 10.1890/120375
[132]	Sanfilippo, M.R., Shvartzshnaider, Y., Reyes, I., Nissenbaum, H., & Egelman, S. (2020). Disaster privacy/privacy disaster. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1002-1014. doi: 10.1002/asi.24353
[133]	Saracevic, T. (1999). Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051-1063 doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:12<1051::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Z
[134]	Schradie, J. (2020). The great equalizer reproduces inequality:How the digital divide is a class power divide. In Eidlin, B., & McCarthy, M.A. (ed.), Rethinking class and social difference (vol. 27). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.
[135]	Selwyn, N. (2020). Re-imagining learning analytics... a case for starting again? Internet and Higher Education, 46, article 100745.
[136]	Semeler, A.R., & Pinto, A.L. (2020). Librarianship in the age of data science:Data librarianship venn diagram. International Conference on Data and Information in Online Environments, 2020, 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50072-6_10
[137]	Semeler, A.R., Pinto, A.L., & Rozados, H.B.F. (2017). Data science in data librarianship: Core competencies of a data librarian. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(3), 771-780. doi: 10.1177/0961000617742465
[138]	Severson, H.H., & Ary, D.V. (1983). Sampling bias due to consent procedures with adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 8(4), 433-437. pmid: 6610283
[139]	Shachaf, P. (2005). A global perspective on library association codes of ethics. Library and Information Science Research, 27(4), 513-533. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2005.08.008
[140]	Shankar, K., Jeng, W., Thomer, A., Weber, N., & Yoon, A. (2020). Data curation as collective action during COVID-19. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(3), 280-284. doi: 10.1002/asi.24406
[141]	Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
[142]	Shen, Y. (2015). Strategic planning for a data-driven, shared-access research enterprise: Virginia Tech research data assessment and landscape study. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 52, 1-4.
[143]	Shilton, K. (2012). Participatory personal data: An emerging research challenge for the information sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(10), 1905-1915. doi: 10.1002/asi.22655
[144]	Shiri, A. (2016). Exploring information ethics: A metadata analytics approach. Journal of Information Ethics, 25(1), 17-37.
[145]	Si, L., Zhuang, X., Xing, W., & Guo, W. (2013). The cultivation of scientific data specialists: Development of LIS education oriented to e-science service requirements. Library Hi Tech, 31(4), 700-724. doi: 10.1108/LHT-06-2013-0070
[146]	Siguenza-Guzman, L., Saquicela, V., Avila-Ordonez, E., Vandewalle, J., & Cattrysse, D. (2015). Literature review of data mining applications in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(4), 499-510. doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2015.06.007
[147]	Šimundić, A. (2013). Bias in research. Biochemia Medica, 23(1), 12-15.
[148]	Smith, J., & Noble, H. (2014). Bias in research. Evidence-based Nursing, 17(4), 100-101. doi: 10.1136/eb-2014-101946 pmid: 25097234
[149]	Smith, L.C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83-106.
[150]	Song, I., & Zhu, Y. (2017). Big data and data science: Opportunities and challenges of iSchools. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(3), 1-18.
[151]	Spector, W.S. (1956). Handbook of biological data. Washington, D.C.: United States' Department of Energy.
[152]	Spink, A., Wolfram, D., Jansen, B.J., & Saracevic, T. (2001). Searching the web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 226-234. doi: 10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1591>3.0.CO;2-R
[153]	Špiranec, S., Kos, D., & George, M. (2019). Searching for critical dimensions in data literacy. Information Research, 24(4), paper colis 1922. https://InformationR.net/ir/24-4/colis/colis1922.html
[154]	Stobierski, T. (2021). 8 steps in the data life cycle. Retrieved from https://online.hbs.edu/blog/post/data-life-cycle
[155]	Taylor, R.S. (1966). Professional aspects of information science and technology. In Cuadra, C. (ed), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (volume 1). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
[156]	Tenopir, C., Hughes, D., Allard, S., Frame, M., Birch, B., Sandusky, R.J., Langseth, M.L., & Lundeen, A. (2015). Research data services in academic libraries: Data intensive roles for the future? Journal of eScience Librarianship, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.7191/jeslib.2015.1085
[157]	Tenopir, C., Rice, N.M., Allard, S., Baird, L., Borycz, J., Christian, L., Grant, B., Olendorf, R., & Sandusky, R.J. (2020). Data sharing, management, use, and reuse: Practices and perceptions of scientists worldwide. PloS One, 15(3), article e0229003.
[158]	Tenopir, C., Sandusky, R.J., Allard, S., & Birch, B. (2014). Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians. Library and Information Science Research, 36(2), 84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003
[159]	Tenopir, C., Talja, S., Horstmann, W., Late, E., Hughes, D., Pollock, D., Schmidt, B., Baird, L., Sandusky, R.J., & Allard, S. (2017). Research data services in European academic research libraries. LIBER Quarterly, 27(1), 23-44. doi: 10.18352/lq.10180
[160]	Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.
[161]	Tremblay, M.C., Deckard, G.J., & Klein, R. (2016). Health informatics and analytics: Building a program to integrate business analytics across clinical and administrative disciplines. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(4), 824-828. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw055
[162]	Trepanier, C., Shiri, A., & Samek, T. (2019). An examination of IFLA and Data Science Association ethical codes. IFLA Journal, 45(4), 289-301. doi: 10.1177/0340035219849614
[163]	Tukey, J.W. (1962). The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(1), 1-67. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177704711
[164]	Turing, A.M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Journal of Math, 58, 230-265.
[165]	van der Aalst, W.M.P., Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2017). Responsible data science. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 59, 311-313. doi: 10.1007/s12599-017-0487-z
[166]	Virkus, S., & Garoufallou, E. (2019). Data science from a library and information science perspective. Data Technologies and Applications, 53(4), 422-441. doi: 10.1108/DTA-05-2019-0076
[167]	Wallace, D.P. (1985). The use of statistical methods in library and information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 36(6), 402-411.
[168]	Waller, M.A., & Fawcett, S.E. (2013). Data science, predictive analytics, and big data: A revolution that will transform supply chain design and management. Journal of Business Logistics, 34(2), 77-84. doi: 10.1111/jbl.12010
[169]	Walter, S. (2008). The library as ecosystem. Library Journal, 133(16), 28-32.
[170]	Wang, L. (2018). Twinning data science with information science in schools of library and information science. Journal of Documentation, 74(6), 1243-1257. doi: 10.1108/JD-02-2018-0036
[171]	Wang, Y., & Lin, C. (2019). A survey of data science programs and courses in the iSchools. Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting, 56, 801-802.
[172]	Washington Durr, A.K. (2020). A text analysis of data science career opportunities and US iSchool curriculum. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 61(2), 270-293.
[173]	Westgard, J.O., & Hunt, M.R. (1973). Use and interpretation of common statistical tests in method-comparison studies. Clinical Chemistry, 19(1), 49-57. pmid: 4683366
[174]	White, H.D. (1977). Machine-readable social science data. Englewood, CO: Information Handling Services.
[175]	Whittaker, M., Alper, M., Bennett, C.L., Hendren, S., Kaziunas, L., Mills, M., …, & West, S.M. (2019). Disability, bias, and AI. New York, NY: AI Now.
[176]	Wilholt, T. (2009). Bias and values in scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science: Part A, 40(1), 92-101. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.12.005
[177]	Wood, S.E. (2017). Police body cameras and professional responsibility: Public records and private evidence. Preservation, Digital Technology, and Culture, 46(1), 41-51. doi: 10.1515/pdtc-2016-0030
[178]	Yarger, L., Payton, F.C., & Neupane, B. (2020). Algorithmic equity in the hiring of underrepresented IT job candidates. Online Information Review, 44(2), 383-395. doi: 10.1108/OIR-10-2018-0334
[179]	Zhang, P., & Benjamin, R.I. (2007). Understanding information related fields: A conceptual framework. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 1934-1947.
[180]	Zimmer, M. (2008). Preface: Critical perspectives on web 2.0. First Monday, 13(3). https://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/2137/1943
[181]	Zwitter, A. (2014). Big data ethics. Big Data and Society, 1(2), 1-6.