| [1] |
Eykens J. (2022). Disciplines, specialization and interdisciplinarity in the social sciences and humanities [Doctoral dissertation, University of Antwerp]. UAntwerp repository. https://repository.uantwerpen.be/docstore/d:irua:12471
|
| [2] |
Eykens J., Guns R., & Vanderstraeten R. (2022). Subject specialties as interdisciplinary trading grounds: The case of the social sciences and humanities. Scientometrics, 128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04254-w
|
| [3] |
Hellsten L., Opthof T., & Leydesdorff L. (2020). N-mode network approach for the sociosemantic analysis of scientific publications. Poetics, 78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2019.101427
|
| [4] |
Jacobs J. (2013). In defense of disciplines:interdisciplinarity and specialization in the research university. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
| [5] |
Pauwels L., & Verhage A. (2019). Criminology in Belgium: from embryonic conception to contemporary currents in a nutshell: some food for thought. Criminology in Europe, 18(2), 9-20.
|
| [6] |
Stichweh R. (1992). The Sociology of Scientific Disciplines: On the Genesis and Stability of the Disciplinary Structure of Modern Science. Science in Context, 5(1), 3-15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889700001071
doi: 10.1017/S0269889700001071
|
| [7] |
Richelle M., Janssen P., & Bredart S. (1992). Psychology in Belgium. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 505-529. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002445
doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002445
|
| [8] |
Weingart P. (1997). From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles?. Social Science Information, 36(4), 591-613. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/053901897036004002
doi: 10.1177/053901897036004002
|
| [9] |
Weingart P. (2003). Growth, Differentiation, Expansion and Change of Identity — The Future of Science. In JoergesB., NowotnyH. (Eds.), Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead. Sociology of the Sciences, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_9
|
)†
